Commercial Contracts with Czech Partners: Common Mistakes Made by Italian Companies

For Italian companies entering Central Europe, the Czech Republic offers a stable and attractive market. Yet commercial contracts with Czech partners can carry unexpected financial risks. This guide answers key legal questions and highlights common pitfalls from differences between Italian and Czech contract law. As a leading Prague law firm with extensive experience advising foreign clients, ARROWS is your trusted English-speaking partner to protect your investments.

Need advice on this topic? Contact the ARROWS law firm by email office@arws.cz or phone +420 245 007 740. Your question will be answered by "Mgr. Vojtěch Sucharda", an expert on the subject.

The Czech-Italian Legal Divide: Why Your Business Instincts Can Be a Liability in Prague

At first glance, the legal systems of Italy and the Czech Republic appear similar. Both are civil law jurisdictions and members of the European Union, a shared foundation that can create a false sense of security for Italian businesses. This assumption is a dangerous one. The reality is that fundamental differences in legal philosophy and business culture create a landscape where an Italian company's greatest perceived strength—its emphasis on relationship-building—can become its most significant legal vulnerability.

Italian contract law is deeply rooted in principles of fairness and the parties' intentions. Core concepts like buona fede (good faith) and causa (the socio-economic purpose of the contract) grant judges considerable flexibility. Italian courts often look beyond the literal text of an agreement to understand the underlying commercial relationship and ensure an equitable outcome.

This legal framework aligns perfectly with Italian business culture, which places a high value on personal trust, long-term relationships, and verbal understandings, with many successful enterprises being family-owned SMEs where a handshake still carries significant weight.

The Czech legal environment, however, operates on a different premise. While also a civil law system, its historical development, influenced by Austrian and German legal traditions, places a much stronger emphasis on the precise, literal wording of the contract. 

In a Czech court, the written agreement is not merely a reflection of the parties' relationship; it is the legally recognized relationship. Any ambiguity, omission, or vaguely worded clause will be interpreted strictly, and can be exploited by the other party. What might be considered a minor detail to be resolved later in the spirit of buona fede in Italy could be a legally binding—and financially punishing—obligation in the Czech Republic.

This creates a critical cultural-legal mismatch. An Italian executive may leave a negotiation feeling confident in a verbal agreement, viewing the subsequent written contract as a formality. From a Czech legal perspective, however, for certain types of agreements, no binding contract exists until it is properly executed in writing. 

This chasm between perception and legal reality is the primary source of costly disputes. Your business instincts, honed in the Italian market, may lead you to overlook clauses or formalities that have severe and irreversible consequences under Czech law.

The Smluvní Pokuta – A Contractual Penalty Unlike Anything in Italian Law

Of all the legal traps awaiting Italian companies in the Czech Republic, the most financially dangerous is the misunderstanding of the contractual penalty, known as the smluvní pokuta. This powerful legal instrument has no direct equivalent in Italian law and can turn a minor contractual breach into a major financial liability. Assuming it functions like the familiar Italian clausola penale is a mistake that can cost your company dearly.

In Italy, the clausola penale is primarily compensatory and is subject to judicial review; a court can reduce a penalty it deems "clearly too high". It is also generally used to secure non-monetary obligations. The Czech smluvní pokuta, by contrast, is a far more flexible and potent tool for the creditor. Under the Czech Civil Code, it can be used to secure any contractual obligation, including purely monetary ones such as a delay in payment.

The primary purpose of the smluvní pokuta is not just to compensate, but to be preventive and punitive. It is designed to create a strong motivation for the other party to comply strictly with the terms. Crucially, the penalty is enforceable even if the creditor suffered no actual financial damage from the breach. An Italian company, accustomed to its domestic legal framework, might easily overlook a smluvní pokuta clause related to payment terms, assuming it is either a minor issue or unenforceable.

Imagine this scenario: an Italian supplier signs a contract with a Czech buyer. The contract contains a smluvní pokuta clause stipulating a penalty of 0.5% of the total contract value for each day of delay in payment. A short, ten-day delay due to an administrative issue could trigger a penalty equivalent to 5% of the entire deal—far exceeding any statutory interest and potentially erasing the project's profit margin. In a Czech court, this clause is likely to be upheld. 

While Czech law does allow for judicial moderation of "disproportionally high" penalties, the threshold and criteria are different from Italian law, and relying on this corrective measure is a risky and expensive litigation strategy.

Dangers of Misunderstanding Contractual Penalties

Risks and Penalties	How ARROWS Helps
Excessive Financial Loss: Agreeing to a penalty for late payment that vastly exceeds statutory interest, potentially crippling project profitability.	Contract Review & Drafting: We scrutinize every clause to identify and renegotiate unfair smluvní pokuta terms. Need your contract reviewed? Contact us at office@arws.cz.
Enforceability Without Damage: Being forced to pay a substantial penalty even if your breach caused no actual harm to the Czech partner.	Legal Opinion: We provide clear legal opinions on the enforceability and potential risks of specific penalty clauses under Czech law. Understand your exposure by writing to office@arws.cz.
Unbalanced Negotiation Power: The Czech partner may use the smluvní pokuta as a powerful lever, knowing foreign counterparts often misunderstand it.	Representation in Negotiations: Our lawyers represent you during negotiations to ensure a fair and balanced contract. For immediate assistance, write to us at office@arws.cz.
Disputes over Penalty Moderation: Facing litigation when trying to argue that a penalty is disproportionately high under Czech legal standards.	Representation in Court: We represent clients before Czech courts in disputes over contractual penalties. Need legal representation? Email us at office@arws.cz.

Invalid Agreements – The Perils of Informal and Verbal Contracts

The Italian business culture of finalizing deals based on trust and verbal agreements can lead to a devastating "validity trap" in the Czech Republic. While a verbal agreement is legally binding in many commercial contexts under Italian law, the Czech legal system imposes strict formal requirements for certain types of contracts, and failure to comply can render an agreement void from the outset.

This divergence is particularly stark in the context of agency agreements. An Italian principal might engage a Czech sales agent based on a series of meetings and email exchanges, believing a binding relationship has been formed. However, under Section 2483 of the Czech Civil Code, an Agency Agreement must be executed in writing (písemná forma) to be legally valid. A verbal agreement is not merely difficult to prove; it is legally non-existent.

The consequences are severe. Your company could invest significant time and resources in supporting a sales agent, providing them with confidential information, samples, and marketing materials, only to discover you have no enforceable contract. If the agent fails to perform, breaches confidentiality, or starts working for a competitor, your legal recourse is severely limited or non-existent. The time and money invested are lost, and you are left with no legal mechanism to protect your interests in the Czech market.

This principle extends beyond agency agreements. Any contract that is not properly documented, with clear and complete identification of the parties (including registration numbers and statutory representatives), can face significant challenges during enforcement. Relying on informal understandings is not a viable business strategy in the Czech Republic; it is an invitation for legal and financial disaster.

FAQ – Legal tips about contract formalities

• Is an email exchange enough to form a valid written contract in the Czech Republic?
  An email exchange can serve as evidence of an agreement, but for certain contracts requiring the písemná forma, it may not be sufficient without authenticated electronic signatures. To ensure your agreement is fully enforceable and avoids any ambiguity, it is crucial to have it formalized in a properly drafted document. For certainty, get tailored legal solutions by writing to office@arws.cz.
• Our Czech partner sent us their standard terms and conditions after we signed the main contract. Are they binding?
  Generally, no. Under Czech law, terms and conditions must be made available to the other party before or at the time of the contract's conclusion to be validly incorporated. A reference to them on an invoice or a shipment document sent after the fact is typically not sufficient to make them part of the agreement. Our lawyers are ready to assist you – email us at office@arws.cz.
• What happens if a contract is missing key details, like the company's registration number?
  Incomplete identification of the contracting parties is a common but serious error. It can create significant difficulties if a dispute arises and you need to prove exactly who you contracted with, potentially delaying or preventing enforcement of your rights. Do not hesitate to contact our firm to ensure your contracts are correctly drafted – office@arws.cz.

Running Out of Time – A Critical Mismatch in the Statute of Limitations

One of the most insidious risks in cross-border commerce is the silent expiration of legal rights. An Italian company, operating under the assumption that it has ample time to pursue a claim, can discover too late that its right to legal action in the Czech Republic has vanished due to a much shorter statute of limitations. This procedural trap is completely independent of the merits of your case; even with a perfect claim, a missed deadline is an absolute bar to recovery.

The difference between the two legal systems is stark. In Italy, the general limitation period for claims arising from a breach of contract is ten years. This generous timeframe allows businesses to negotiate, gather evidence, and make strategic decisions about litigation without immediate pressure.

In the Czech Republic, the clock ticks much faster. The subjective limitation period for many civil claims is only three years, while a four-year period often applies to commercial relationships.4 This period typically begins from the date the right could have been exercised for the first time, such as the date a faulty product was delivered or a payment was missed.

Consider this practical scenario: an Italian manufacturing company receives a defective shipment of components from a Czech supplier in May 2022. The defects only become apparent a year later. The company's in-house counsel in Milan, operating under Italian legal norms, might advise that there is no rush, as they have until 2032 to file a lawsuit. However, under Czech law, the three- or four-year limitation period may have already expired by 2025 or 2026, leaving the Italian company with a valid grievance but no legal remedy. The claim is forfeited entirely.

This procedural discrepancy demands a fundamental shift in how Italian companies manage their legal risks in the Czech Republic. It is not enough to seek legal advice only when a contract is being drafted or when a dispute has already escalated. The risk of missing a crucial deadline necessitates proactive, ongoing legal oversight from a local partner. 

Your legal department in Italy cannot be expected to track the nuances of Czech procedural deadlines. You need a law firm on the ground in Prague to act as an extension of your team, monitoring potential claims and ensuring your legal rights are preserved long before they are at risk of expiring. This transforms legal support from a reactive service into an essential component of your ongoing risk management strategy.

Choosing the Wrong Battlefield – Ineffective Dispute Resolution Clauses

The final pages of a contract, often filled with "boilerplate" clauses governing choice of law and dispute resolution, are frequently overlooked during negotiations. This is a critical error. When a commercial relationship breaks down, these clauses become the most important part of the entire agreement, dictating where, how, and under which laws your dispute will be resolved. For an Italian company, a poorly drafted dispute resolution clause can mean being forced into an unfavorable, slow, and expensive legal battle.

Many foreign companies are aware that litigation in Italy can be exceptionally slow and procedurally complex, a process sometimes described as a "nightmare" due to an overburdened court system. Agreeing to Italian jurisdiction by default may not be in your best interest, especially if you are the claimant seeking a swift resolution.

Conversely, the Czech legal system, while not without its own potential for delays in state courts, offers a highly efficient and internationally respected alternative: arbitration. The Arbitration Court attached to the Economic Chamber and Agricultural Chamber of the Czech Republic, based in Prague, is a well-regarded institution that resolves most commercial disputes within a year. Proceedings are more informal, faster, and can be conducted by arbitrators with specific industry expertise.

A common concern for foreign companies is whether a judgment or arbitral award from a Czech forum will be enforceable back home. Thanks to EU-wide regulations, particularly the Recast Brussels Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, this is not a significant obstacle. A final decision from a Czech court or an arbitral award is readily recognized and enforced in Italy and throughout the European Union, providing legal certainty and a clear path to recovering assets. 

Proactively choosing Prague as the seat of arbitration in your contract can therefore provide a significant strategic advantage, ensuring a faster, more predictable, and easily enforceable outcome.

Risks of Poorly Drafted Dispute Resolution Clauses

Risks and Penalties	How ARROWS Helps
Protracted and Costly Litigation: Being dragged into a slow court system, leading to years of uncertainty and high legal fees.	Strategic Clause Drafting: We draft clear dispute resolution clauses specifying efficient forums like the Prague Arbitration Court. Need legal help? Contact us at office@arws.cz.
Unfavorable Governing Law: Having your dispute judged under a legal system you are unfamiliar with, creating unpredictable outcomes.	Legal Analysis: We analyze the pros and cons of choosing Czech vs. Italian law for your specific contract. Want to understand your legal options? Email us at office@arws.cz.
Enforcement Challenges: Obtaining a judgment that is difficult or impossible to enforce in the country where the other party's assets are located.	EU Law Expertise: We ensure your dispute resolution clause complies with EU regulations for seamless cross-border enforcement. Get tailored legal solutions by writing to office@arws.cz.
Loss of Control: Relying on default legal provisions that may not be in your best interest, rather than proactively defining the dispute process.	Contract Negotiation: We negotiate robust dispute resolution mechanisms that protect your interests from day one. Our lawyers are ready to assist you – email us at office@arws.cz.

Your Strategic Partner in Prague: How ARROWS Bridges the Legal Gap for Italian Businesses

Navigating the complexities of the Czech legal market requires more than just a translator; it demands a strategic legal partner with a deep, nuanced understanding of both the local legal landscape and the expectations of international clients. ARROWS, a leading Czech law firm in Prague, EU, is precisely that partner. We combine sophisticated local expertise with a global perspective to protect the interests of our foreign clients, ensuring their business ventures in the Czech Republic are built on a secure legal foundation.

For over a decade, we have been building our ARROWS International network, a robust global alliance that allows us to seamlessly handle complex cross-border matters in over 90 countries. This international presence, managed from our headquarters in a safe European harbour, gives us a unique advantage in understanding and resolving the challenges faced by companies like yours. Our lawyers are not just experts in Czech law; they are adept at bridging the legal and cultural gaps that so often lead to disputes.

We provide a comprehensive suite of services designed to address the specific risks Italian companies face:

• To avoid the smluvní pokuta trap, we provide expert contract drafting and review, ensuring all penalty clauses are fair, balanced, and clearly understood.
• To prevent your agreements from being declared invalid, we manage the preparation of all legally required documentation, ensuring strict compliance with Czech formalities.
• Should a dispute arise, we offer robust representation in court or before public authorities, leveraging our extensive litigation experience to defend your interests.
• To empower your team, we offer professional training for management on the key differences in Czech contract law, providing them with the knowledge to avoid common pitfalls.

Our track record speaks for itself. ARROWS provides legal support to over 150 joint-stock companies and 250 limited liability companies. Our reputation for speed, quality, and a commercially-minded approach makes us the firm of choice for foreign investors seeking to operate and thrive in the Czech market.

Secure Your Czech Venture: The Next Step

The Czech Republic offers a stable, prosperous, and strategically located environment for Italian businesses to expand within the European Union. It is a safe European harbour with a predictable legal system and a welcoming attitude towards foreign investment. However, success in this market depends on recognizing and respecting the unique aspects of its legal framework. The greatest risk to your investment is not the market itself, but the assumption that Czech law operates just like Italian law.

From punitive contractual penalties and strict formal requirements to shorter limitation periods, the potential for costly mistakes is real. Protecting your business requires proactive, expert legal guidance from a partner who understands these differences intimately. As an international law firm operating from Prague, European Union, ARROWS is dedicated to helping Italian companies navigate these challenges safely and profitably.

Do not let preventable legal errors undermine your success in the Czech Republic. To protect your investments and ensure your commercial contracts are secure, contact our team of experts today. Write to us at office@arws.cz for a preliminary consultation.

FAQ – Most common legal questions about Czech-Italian commercial contracts

1. What is the single biggest mistake an Italian company can make in a Czech contract?
The most dangerous mistake is underestimating the Czech contractual penalty (smluvní pokuta). Unlike the Italian clausola penale, it can be applied to late payments and doesn't require the other party to prove they suffered any damage, leading to severe financial loss. To review your penalty clauses, contact our experts at office@arws.cz.

2. Can I rely on a verbal agreement with my Czech partner?
It is extremely risky. Certain contracts, like agency agreements, are legally void in the Czech Republic unless they are in writing (písemná forma). Always insist on a comprehensive written contract. For assistance with drafting legally required documentation, email us at office@arws.cz.

3. How long do I have to file a lawsuit for a contract breach in the Czech Republic?
The time limit is much shorter than in Italy. For many commercial claims, the period is three or four years, compared to the general ten-year period in Italy. Missing this deadline means you lose your right to claim. Need legal help with a potential claim? Contact us at office@arws.cz.

4. Should I choose Czech or Italian law to govern my contract?
This is a strategic decision that depends on many factors, including where the contract will be performed and where the parties' assets are. An experienced law firm can help you make the most advantageous choice for enforceability and predictability. For a strategic legal consultation, write to office@arws.cz.

5. Is a court judgment from Prague enforceable in Italy?
Yes. Due to EU regulations, judgments and arbitral awards issued in one EU member state are readily recognized and enforced in others. This makes Prague a secure and predictable venue for dispute resolution. Our lawyers are ready to assist with cross-border enforcement – email us at office@arws.cz.

6. Why is Prague a good place for my company to do business?
The Czech Republic offers a stable political and economic environment, a skilled workforce, and a strategic location in the heart of Europe. As a leading
international law firm operating from Prague, European Union, we help foreign investors navigate its predictable legal system to ensure their success. Do not hesitate to contact our firm for more information – office@arws.cz.

Don't want to deal with this problem yourself? More than 2,000 clients trust us, and we have been named Law Firm of the Year 2024. Take a look HERE at our references.