How can an Irish company litigate in the Czech Republic
Facing a legal dispute in the Czech Republic can be a daunting prospect for any Irish company. This guide provides clear, actionable answers on navigating the Czech court system, highlighting key differences from Irish procedures. As a leading Czech law firm in Prague, EU, with extensive experience assisting foreign clients, ARROWS has the expertise you need. Find out how our English-speaking lawyers can protect your interests.

Need advice on this topic? Contact the ARROWS law firm by email office@arws.cz or phone +420 245 007 740. Your question will be answered by "Mgr. Vojtěch Sucharda", an expert on the subject.
The Starting Point: Understanding Jurisdiction in EU Cross-Border Disputes
Before any legal strategy can be formed, the first critical question is: where will the case be heard? For businesses operating within the European Union, this is not a matter of guesswork. A predictable, harmonized system governs cross-border civil and commercial disputes, providing a clear framework for both Irish and Czech companies.
The Brussels I bis Regulation: Your Rulebook for EU Litigation
The primary legal instrument is Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012, commonly known as the Brussels I bis Regulation. This regulation ensures the "free movement of judgments" and establishes uniform rules on jurisdiction for all member states. It applies directly to civil and commercial matters, taking precedence over national laws in cross-border cases.
The general rule is straightforward: a defendant should be sued in the courts of the EU member state where they are domiciled. If your dispute is with a company whose registered office is in Prague, the default venue for your lawsuit will be the Czech courts. However, this simple rule belies a deeper strategic complexity, as the Regulation provides crucial exceptions.
Crucial Exceptions You Can Leverage
These exceptions can offer a significant tactical advantage. For contractual disputes, you may have the option to sue in the courts for the "place of performance of theobligation in question". For non-contractual matters, such as a tort claim, jurisdiction lies with the courts of the "place where the harmful event occurred".
This creates a strategic choice. If a defective product manufactured in the Czech Republic caused damage in Ireland, you could potentially sue in either country. The initial decision of where to file is not merely procedural; it is the foundational strategic act of the entire case. An incorrect choice can lead to dismissal, wasted costs, and significant delays.
The Power of a Choice of Jurisdiction Clause
The most effective way to control this variable is through a well-drafted contract. The Brussels I bis Regulation strongly upholds choice of jurisdiction clauses, where parties agree in advance which country's courts will resolve disputes. The Regulation treats this clause as an independent agreement, meaning it can remain valid even if the main contract is not.
FAQ – Legal tips about choosing the right court
- Can we sue a Czech company in Ireland?
Generally, you must sue them in the Czech Republic. However, exceptions exist based on where a contract was to be performed or where damage occurred. We can analyze your specific situation to identify the most advantageous venue. For an expert assessment, contact us at office@arws.cz. - What if our contract specifies Irish courts?
A properly drafted choice of jurisdiction clause is generally enforceable under EU law. However, its validity depends on precise wording and context. Expert review is vital to ensure it will be upheld. Get tailored legal solutions by writing to office@arws.cz. - The damage occurred in Ireland, but the breach was in the Czech Republic. Where do we file?
The Brussels I bis Regulation gives you a strategic choice of venues. The best option depends on the specifics of your case, including evidence location and legal objectives. Our lawyers can advise on the most effective strategy. Email us at office@arws.cz.
Not in Dublin Anymore: Key Differences Between Irish and Czech Court Procedures
While EU regulations harmonize where you can sue, they do not change how you sue. The Czech legal process is fundamentally different from that of Ireland. An Irish company that assumes procedural similarity is at a significant disadvantage. Understanding these differences is the first step toward building a winning strategy.
Codified Law vs. Common Law: A Fundamental Shift in Legal Thinking
Ireland operates under a common law system, where the doctrine of precedent is central. Decisions from superior courts are binding, and legal arguments are built by citing past cases. The Czech Republic, like most of continental Europe, has a civil law system based on codified statutes. Judges prioritize the text of the law—such as the Civil Code and Commercial Code—over judicial precedent. Case law is persuasive, but not binding.
This means that a legal argument that would be compelling in the Irish High Court may be irrelevant in a Prague courtroom. Your strategy must be grounded in a deep interpretation of Czech statutory law, a skill that requires specialized local expertise.
The Discovery Process: The Biggest Procedural Hurdle
Perhaps the most significant shock for an Irish litigant is the near-absence of a pre-trial "discovery" process as it is known in Ireland. The Irish High Court system involves an extensive, and often costly, discovery phase where parties are obligated to disclose all relevant documents to each other. This allows a case to be built over time as evidence is exchanged.
This does not happen in the Czech Republic. The Czech Code of Civil Procedure places the "burden of proof" squarely on each party to substantiate its claims from the very beginning. You cannot launch a "fishing expedition" to find evidence. This front-loads the entire evidence-gathering process, requiring you to have your case fully prepared before you file your claim.
Language and Formalities: Non-Negotiable Rules
All court proceedings in the Czech Republic are conducted in the Czech language. This is an absolute rule. Every piece of documentary evidence—contracts, invoices, board minutes, and correspondence—must be submitted to the court with an official translation performed by a translator certified by a Czech court. Failure to comply can lead to delays or the rejection of your evidence.
Procedural Risks for Unprepared Irish Companies
|
Risks and penalties |
How ARROWS helps |
|
Invalid Legal Strategy: Relying on Irish common law precedent, which has no binding force in a Czech court, leading to a weak or irrelevant case. |
Legal analysis: We translate your commercial objectives into powerful arguments based on Czech statutes. Want to understand your legal options? Email us at office@arws.cz. |
|
Insufficient Evidence: Failing to present all necessary evidence upfront due to the mistaken assumption of a later, Irish-style "discovery" phase. This can be fatal to your claim. |
Case preparation: We guide you on gathering and structuring evidence to meet the strict requirements of the Czech Civil Procedure Code. For immediate assistance, write to us at office@arws.cz. |
|
Case Dismissal on Formalities: Submitting documents without certified Czech translations, leading to procedural delays or rejection by the court. |
Drafting legally required documentation: We manage all translation and formal requirements to ensure your submissions are flawless. Need legal help? Contact us at office@arws.cz. |
|
Misinterpreting Judicial Role: Expecting a Czech judge to act like an Irish judge in a purely adversarial system, without understanding their more active role in the proceedings. |
Representation in court: Our lawyers are experts in Czech courtroom advocacy and procedure. Need legal representation? Write to office@arws.cz. |
A Practical Roadmap to the Czech Civil Litigation Process
Navigating the Czech court system requires a clear understanding of its distinct stages. While the system is designed to be efficient, this speed can be a significant threat to a party that is not fully prepared from day one. Here is a step-by-step overview of what to expect.
Step 1: Filing the Action (Žaloba)
The process begins by filing a formal statement of claim, known as a žaloba, with the competent court. For most significant commercial disputes, especially those involving foreign entities, the court of first instance will be a Regional Court (krajský soud), not a lower-level District Court. The žaloba is the most critical document in the entire litigation. It must comprehensively state the facts, identify the evidence you rely on, and specify the exact relief you are seeking.
Step 2: Service and Defendant's Response
Once filed, the court officially serves the žaloba on the defendant. The defendant is then given a strict deadline to file a written response, outlining their defense and presenting their own evidence. The court may allow for a further exchange of written statements to clarify the issues before a hearing is scheduled.
Step 3: The Hearing and Taking of Evidence
The court will schedule an oral hearing where both parties present their case. The judge plays an active role, examining documents, hearing witness testimony, and considering expert opinions. To maximize efficiency, the court may order a preliminary hearing to ensure all facts and evidence are introduced early, with the goal of potentially deciding the entire dispute in a single session.
Step 4: Judgment and the Appeals Process (Odvolání)
After the hearing, the first-instance court issues a judgment. If either party is dissatisfied, it has the right to file an appeal, or odvolání, with the superior court—typically a High Court (vrchní soud). A final avenue of appeal on points of law to the Supreme Court, known as a dovolání, is available in specific circumstances.
Understanding the Statute of Limitations
A critical trap for foreign companies is the Czech statute of limitations. For most commercial claims, there is a subjective three-year period, which begins when you knew (or should have known) about the damage and the liable party. This is backed by an absolute objective ten-year period from when the damage occurred. This is significantly shorter than the standard six-year period for contract claims in Ireland and requires swift action to preserve your rights.
Financial and Operational Risks in Czech Litigation
|
Risks and penalties |
How ARROWS helps |
|
Uncontrolled Legal Costs: Incurring high fees for translations, expert reports, and representation due to an inefficient or poorly managed case strategy. |
Strategic case management: We provide clear cost estimates and manage your case efficiently to minimize expense. Get tailored legal solutions by writing to office@arws.cz. |
|
Severe Enforcement Actions (Exekuce): Facing frozen bank accounts, property seizure, or liens if a judgment is enforced against you, causing major business disruption. |
Proactive defense & appeals: We build a strong defense to prevent negative judgments and can represent you in appeals to pause enforcement. Our lawyers are ready to assist you – email us at office@arws.cz. |
|
Procedural Fines: Being fined by the court (up to CZK 50,000 per instance) for failing to comply with procedural orders, such as producing requested documents. |
Legal consultations to prevent penalties: We ensure full compliance with all court orders and deadlines, protecting you from unnecessary fines. For immediate assistance, write to us at office@arws.cz. |
|
Wasted Management Time: Diverting key executives from core business activities to manage a complex foreign lawsuit without expert local support. |
Full-service representation: We handle every aspect of the litigation, allowing you to focus on your business. Do not hesitate to contact our firm – office@arws.cz. |
Enforcing Your Judgment: A Seamless EU Process
A victory in court is only meaningful if the judgment can be enforced. Fortunately, the same EU framework that governs jurisdiction also simplifies the cross-border enforcement of court decisions, ensuring that a judgment obtained in Prague carries weight in Dublin, and vice versa.
Enforcing a Czech Judgment in Ireland
Thanks to the Brussels I bis Regulation, a judgment from a Czech court is automatically recognized in Ireland without any need for special proceedings or re-litigation. To enforce the decision, you simply need to provide the Irish authorities with a copy of the judgment and a standard certificate issued by the Czech court confirming its enforceability.
How Enforcement Works on the Ground in Prague
Should you obtain a judgment against a Czech entity, enforcement within the Czech Republic is a powerful and effective process known as exekuce. The process is typically handled by a licensed court bailiff (soudní exekutor), who has significant powers to compel payment. These powers include freezing and seizing funds from all Czech bank accounts, placing liens on real estate, seizing movable property like vehicles and inventory, and garnishing payments owed to the debtor from their own business partners.
ARROWS International: Your Cross-Border Enforcement Partner
While the right to enforce a judgment across the EU is simple, the practical process of enforcement is governed by local national law and requires local expertise. As an international law firm operating from Prague, European Union, ARROWS leverages its ARROWS International network, built over 10 years, to provide seamless support for enforcing judgments not only in the Czech Republic and Ireland but across 90 countries worldwide.
Why ARROWS Is Your Essential Partner in the Czech Republic
Successfully litigating in a foreign country requires more than just a lawyer; it requires a strategic partner who can bridge legal, cultural, and procedural divides. ARROWS is uniquely positioned to be that partner for Irish companies facing disputes in the Czech Republic.
Bridging the Common Law / Civil Law Divide
Our lawyers combine deep, technical knowledge of Czech codified law with a practical understanding of foreign markets and the common law mindset of our Irish clients. We do not just translate language; we translate legal culture, ensuring your commercial objectives are framed in the most powerful and effective way for a Czech court.
A Full Suite of Services for Your Business
We provide comprehensive support at every stage. This includes the initial legal analysis to determine the best strategy, drafting all legally required documentation, providing robust representation in court, and even offering professional training for your management to prevent future disputes. We are adept at preparing internal policies and reviewing contracts to shield you from fines and litigation.
With a proven track record supporting over 150 joint-stock companies and 250 limited liability companies, our firm is built for speed and quality. Through our ARROWS International network, we offer a global reach from our strategic base in Prague.
Dangers of Navigating Czech Litigation Without Expert Local Counsel
|
Risks and penalties |
How ARROWS helps |
|
Missing Critical Deadlines: Failing to meet the strict statute of limitations (3 years subjective) or procedural deadlines, resulting in the forfeiture of your legal rights. |
Proactive legal management: We monitor all deadlines and ensure every action is taken in a timely manner. Do not hesitate to contact our firm – office@arws.cz. |
|
Cultural and Procedural Missteps: Weakening your case through ignorance of local legal etiquette and unwritten procedural rules. |
Expert local representation: Our lawyers navigate the Czech legal culture with confidence and skill, presenting your case effectively. Get tailored legal solutions by writing to office@arws.cz. |
|
Inability to Negotiate Effectively: Lacking the local knowledge to assess an opponent's weaknesses or leverage the unique pressures of the Czech legal system to force a favorable settlement. |
Strategic negotiation support: We use our deep understanding of Czech law and business practices to secure the best possible outcome for you. Need legal help? Contact us at office@arws.cz. |
|
Isolation and Lack of Network: Operating in a foreign legal environment without access to local experts, authorities, or business connections. |
Connecting clients: We are a law firm based in Prague, European Union, and can connect clients with mutual business interests. Our lawyers are ready to assist you – email us at office@arws.cz. |
Conclusion: Secure Your Business Interests in the Czech Republic
Litigating in the Czech Republic presents Irish companies with a unique set of challenges: a fundamental shift from common to civil law, the absence of a familiar discovery process, and strict, unforgiving procedural rules. Navigating this landscape without expert local guidance is a significant business risk.
ARROWS provides the essential bridge between the Irish and Czech legal worlds. Our team combines international perspective with deep local expertise to protect your investments and secure successful outcomes. Protect your business and ensure your rights are defended effectively. Contact our team of experienced English-speaking lawyers at our leading Czech law firm in Prague, EU. For a confidential consultation, email us today at office@arws.cz.
FAQ – Most common legal questions about litigating in the Czech Republic
1. How long does a typical commercial lawsuit take in the Czech Republic?
The timeline can vary significantly based on complexity, but a first-instance judgment in a commercial case often takes between two and three years. An appeal can add a similar amount of time. However, the system's focus on efficiency means a well-prepared case can move more quickly. For a specific timeline assessment of your case, contact us at office@arws.cz.
2. Is legal representation mandatory for a foreign company in Czech courts?
While not always mandatory in first-instance courts, it is practically essential for a foreign company to navigate the language barrier and complex procedural rules effectively. Legal representation is required for extraordinary appeals (dovolání) to the Supreme Court. To ensure your rights are fully protected from the start, email our lawyers at office@arws.cz.
3. Can we recover our legal costs if we win the case?
Yes, the general principle in Czech civil procedure is that costs follow the event, meaning the losing party is ordered to pay the successful party's legal costs. However, the recoverable amount is calculated based on statutory tariffs and will likely not cover 100% of your actual expenses. For a clear understanding of potential costs and recovery, write to us at office@arws.cz.
4. What is the statute of limitations for a breach of contract claim in the Czech Republic?
The Czech Republic uses a dual system: a three-year subjective period that starts from when you knew or should have known about the breach, and an absolute ten-year objective period from the date the breach occurred. This is much stricter than Ireland's standard six-year period and requires immediate action. Do not miss your deadline; get help by contacting office@arws.cz.
5. What is the difference between litigation and arbitration in the Czech Republic?
Litigation takes place in the public state court system. Arbitration is a private dispute resolution method where an independent arbitrator or tribunal makes a binding decision. It is often faster and less formal but is only available if both parties have agreed to it in a written arbitration clause. We can advise on the best path for your dispute. Our lawyers are ready to assist you – email us at office@arws.cz.
6. All our documents are in English. Is that a problem?
Yes, this is a critical issue that must be addressed. All documents and evidence submitted to a Czech court must be accompanied by an official translation from a court-certified translator. This is a strict procedural requirement. We manage this entire process for our clients to ensure full compliance. For seamless handling of your case, contact our firm at office@arws.cz.
Don't want to deal with this problem yourself? More than 2,000 clients trust us, and we have been named Law Firm of the Year 2024. Take a look HERE at our references.