How to Enforce Debts in the Czech Republic:

For Polish businesses dealing with unpaid invoices from Czech clients, the frustration is familiar, but the path to recovery can seem complex. Navigating a foreign legal system, language barriers, and procedural differences can be a daunting prospect. This guide is designed to cut through that complexity, providing clear and actionable answers to legal concerns regarding cross-border debt recovery.

By outlining the critical steps, legal tools, and potential pitfalls, this report aims to equip Polish business owners, investors, and legal departments with the knowledge needed to recover their funds and, where necessary, understand how a Czech law firm based in Prague, European Union, can provide the essential expertise for a successful outcome.

Need advice on this topic? Contact the ARROWS law firm by email office@arws.cz or phone +420 245 007 740. Your question will be answered by "Mgr. Vojtěch Sucharda", an expert on the subject.

A Strategic First Step: The Power of Amicable Resolution

Before initiating any formal legal action, the most strategic and cost-effective first step in the Czech Republic is a professional, out-of-court approach. This amicable phase is not a sign of weakness; it is a calculated business decision that prioritizes financial recovery while preserving potentially valuable commercial relationships. By engaging in skilled negotiation and drafting legally sound agreements, many disputes can be resolved quickly and efficiently.  

Research indicates that up to 95% of commercial debt cases in the Czech Republic can be resolved successfully without ever entering a courtroom. This high success rate demonstrates that a well-executed pre-litigation strategy is often the fastest path to payment, avoiding costly court fees and the unpredictable timelines of a full lawsuit.

Local law firm’s assistance in this stage can be invaluable, as it includes the preparation of professional, binding settlement agreements and instalment plans with robust enforcement clauses. This proactive approach allows a business to recover its funds while maintaining a positive reputation and a viable commercial relationship with its client.

The Crucial Legal Differences Between Czech and Polish Debt Recovery

Polish companies are well-versed in their domestic legal framework, but assuming that similar concepts operate identically in the Czech Republic can be a costly mistake. The legal differences are subtle yet significant and understanding them is essential for any successful cross-border debt collection effort.

Why a Simple Reminder is Not Enough: The Mandatory Czech Warning Letter

A key difference between Polish and Czech pre-litigation practices is the specific requirement for a formal warning letter. While Polish law establishes a pre-trial procedure that involves informing the debtor multiple times about the debt, the Czech system has a more stringent procedural rule. The Czech Code of Civil Procedure requires that a creditor send a specific pre-action letter to the debtor's last known address at least seven days before filing a claim in court.  

This is more than a simple formality; it is a critical requirement directly linked to the recovery of legal costs. If this specific, legally compliant notice is not sent and properly documented, a Czech court will likely refuse to award the creditor their legal costs, even if they win the case on its merits. This single rule underscores that effective cross-border debt collection requires deep local knowledge that goes beyond a simple translation of standard procedures. Engaging a leading Czech law firm in Prague, EU, is essential to ensure that your pre-action letter meets all Czech legal standards, safeguarding your right to cost recovery.  

Contact our experts:

The Statute of Limitations: A Time-Sensitive Risk

Another critical difference lies in the statute of limitations. For most business claims in Poland, the general limitation period is three years. In the Czech Republic, the general limitation period for commercial debts is also three years, starting from the invoice's due date. While some sources may cite a four-year period, this often pertains to specific contract types or older legislation. Relying on such generic information can be dangerous. It is critical to initiate legal action before this period expires, as a court will dismiss the claim if the debtor raises the objection that it is time-barred.  

A written acknowledgment of the debt by the debtor, however, can restart the limitation period, creating a new ten-year term. This means that a timely, well-documented warning letter can serve not only as a procedural requirement but also as a strategic tool to secure an acknowledgment of the debt and extend the period for legal action.  

The following table summarizes these and other pre-litigation risks, along with the tailored services a Czech law firm like ARROWS can provide to mitigate them.

Risks and Penalties	How ARROWS Helps
Failing to send a compliant pre-action letter: Forfeiting the right to recover legal costs, even if you win the case.	Drafting legally required documentation: We ensure your pre-action letter meets all Czech standards to secure cost recovery. Write to us at office@arws.cz.
Missing the statute of limitations: The claim becomes legally unenforceable, leading to a complete loss of the debt.	Legal consultations: We assess your claim's validity and timeline to prevent it from becoming time barred. For an urgent review, email office@arws.cz.
Agreeing to poorly negotiated payment plans: Agreeing to a verbal or informal plan that is not legally enforceable if the debtor defaults again.	Contract drafting: We draft binding settlement agreements and instalment plans with enforcement clauses. Get tailored legal solutions by writing to office@arws.cz.
Inadequate documentation: Failing to gather all necessary evidence (contracts, invoices, delivery notes) weakens your position for potential litigation.	Document review: Our lawyers can review your documentation to ensure your application is built on a solid foundation. Need legal help organizing your documentation? Contact us at office@arws.cz.

What Legal Tools Can You Use to Collect an Unpaid Invoice?

If amicable efforts fail, the Czech legal system provides powerful tools to compel payment, including a fast-track procedure specifically designed for undisputed claims.

The Czech Fast-Track: Securing a Platební Rozkaz (Payment Order)

For undisputed commercial debts, the most powerful tool in the Czech legal system is the návrh na platební rozkaz, or Payment Order Procedure. This is a streamlined judicial process that allows a court to issue a binding payment order without holding a formal hearing. The court reviews the application and evidence alone and, if the judge finds the claim well-founded, issues the platební rozkaz. This process has no upper monetary limit and is significantly faster than standard litigation, potentially resolving a case in a few weeks or months.  

The Crucial Role of Evidence

The success of a platební rozkaz hinges on providing strong, clear documentary evidence. Czech courts heavily favour such evidence over witness testimony. A creditor must provide a solid evidentiary package that includes signed contracts, issued invoices, confirmed delivery notes, and any correspondence where the debtor acknowledges the debt. This preference for documentation means that meticulous record-keeping is not just a best practice, but a prerequisite for success. A leading international law firm operating from Prague, European Union, can review an existing evidence package to ensure it is structured persuasively for a Czech judge.  

When Your Debtor Fights Back: The Impact of an Odpor (Objection)

A debtor who receives a platební rozkaz has 15 days from the date of delivery to either pay the full amount or file a formal objection, known as an odpor. The filing of a simple odpor has an immediate and significant legal effect: the platební rozkaz is automatically cancelled in its entirety.

The case then transforms into a standard civil lawsuit, which is substantially more complex, costly, and time-consuming. This procedural pivot highlights the importance of having a robust legal strategy prepared from the outset, including local legal representation ready to transition the case from a simplified procedure to full-blown litigation.  

Your Cross-Border Advantage: The European Payment Order (EOP)

For undisputed monetary claims between parties in different EU member states (excluding Denmark), the European Payment Order (EOP) offers a standardized and highly effective alternative to national procedures. This mechanism is particularly well-suited for Polish creditors seeking payment from Czech debtors. A creditor files a standard Form A with the competent court, which then has 30 days to issue the EOP. The debtor then has 30 days to pay or file an opposition.  

The key advantage of the EOP is that if the debtor does not contest the claim, the resulting order is automatically recognized and enforceable in the Czech Republic without needing a separate declaration of enforceability, or exequatur. This eliminates a major legal hurdle for cross-border enforcement and is a critical tool for EU businesses. An English-speaking lawyer from a law firm based in Prague can manage the entire EOP application process and is prepared to seamlessly take over the case if an objection is filed, ensuring a claim is not derailed.  

Risk Tables: Judicial & Enforcement Risks & How ARROWS Helps

The following tables highlight the key risks associated with the judicial and enforcement phases of debt collection and detail how a specialized law firm can help.

Risks and Penalties	How ARROWS Helps
Failing to provide proper evidence: An application for a platební rozkaz is rejected, wasting time and money.	Legal analysis: Our lawyers structure your evidence persuasively for a Czech judge. Want to understand your legal options? Email us at office@arws.cz.
Debtor filing an odpor (objection): The fast-track procedure is automatically cancelled, and the case escalates to a more costly and lengthy civil lawsuit.	Representation in court: We stand ready to act as your local litigation team, ensuring your claim is not derailed. Do not hesitate to contact our firm – office@arws.cz.
Language and procedural barriers in court: Foreign firms must navigate complex legal proceedings conducted in Czech, increasing the risk of procedural errors.	Legal assistance: We handle all court proceedings with deep knowledge of local law and in the Czech language. For a consultation, email us at office@arws.cz.
Selecting the wrong judicial procedure: Using ordinary litigation when a faster, more cost-effective procedure like the EOP is available.	Legal opinions: We provide honest, practical advice on the best procedure for your specific claim. Our lawyers are ready to assist you – email us at office@arws.cz.

From Judgment to Payment: The Czech Enforcement (Exekuce) Process

Obtaining a court judgment is a major victory, but it is only the beginning of the final, crucial stage: turning that judgment into actual payment. In the Czech Republic, this is achieved through the enforcement process, known as exekuce.  

The process is initiated by filing an enforcement proposal based on an "enforceable title". Once authorized by the court, a Czech bailiff, or exekutor, has broad powers to seize nearly any asset belonging to the debtor. This includes freezing funds in bank accounts, placing liens on real estate, and seizing vehicles, company shares, and other movable property.  

For Polish businesses, the enforcement process is significantly simplified by EU regulations. A judgment issued by a Polish court is directly enforceable in the Czech Republic due to the EU's Recast Brussels Regulation. This means there is no need for a lengthy and costly recognition process.

However, while this simplifies the legal framework, a local expert is still required to navigate the exekuce process, manage the bailiff's actions, and ensure the judgment is correctly enforced against the debtor's assets. A leading Czech law firm in Prague, EU, can manage the entire process of domesticating and enforcing a Polish judgment for enforcement by a Czech exekutor.  

Final Call-to-Action

Recovering an unpaid invoice in a foreign country can be a complex and emotionally taxing experience. As this guide has shown, success hinges on a deep understanding of local laws, from the specific requirements of a pre-action letter to the intricacies of court procedures and asset enforcement. A misstep at any stage can lead to a significant financial loss.

ARROWS, a leading Czech law firm in Prague, European Union, has over a decade of experience building its ARROWS International network, which operates in more than 90 countries worldwide. This network, combined with our local knowledge, enables us to provide comprehensive legal solutions to foreign businesses.

We have a proven track record of supporting over 150 joint-stock companies and 250 limited liability companies, and our team is known for its speed and high quality. We can provide professional training for employees or management on how to prevent debt, review and draft contracts to mitigate risk, and offer legal consultations to help you stay ahead of potential issues. Ready to take back what's yours? Get tailored legal solutions by writing to office@arws.cz.  

FAQ – Most common legal questions about Debt Collection in the Czech Republic

1. What is the statute of limitations for a commercial debt in the Czech Republic? The general limitation period for a commercial debt in the Czech Republic is three years, starting from the invoice's due date. It is critical to initiate legal action before this period expires, as a court will dismiss a time-barred claim if the debtor raises the objection. To verify if your claim is still enforceable, contact our lawyers at office@arws.cz.  

2. How much does it cost to collect a debt through the Czech courts? Costs consist of court fees and legal fees. Court fees are typically a percentage of the claimed amount—5% for a standard lawsuit or 4% for a simplified electronic payment order for claims over CZK 20,000. Legal fees vary with the case's complexity. Crucially, if you win, these costs are generally recoverable from the debtor, provided all procedural rules, like the pre-action letter, were correctly followed. For a detailed cost assessment of your case, email us at office@arws.cz.  

3. What if the debtor has no assets? Our process includes investigating the debtor's assets to assess the viability of enforcement. If a debtor is truly without assets, we provide a clear legal opinion to help you avoid incurring further costs on an unrecoverable debt. Do not hesitate to contact our firm – office@arws.cz.  

4. What documentation and evidence do I need to gather? Czech courts heavily favour strong, clear documentary evidence. This includes signed contracts, issued invoices, confirmed delivery notes, and any correspondence where the debtor acknowledges the debt. You must retain all original documents, as the court may require them later. Need legal help organizing your documentation? Contact us at office@arws.cz.  

5. What if the debtor is insolvent? If a debtor declares insolvency, all individual debt collection and enforcement actions are automatically stopped. You must then register your claim with the insolvency court within a specified deadline to participate in the proceedings. For immediate assistance with insolvency matters, write to us at office@arws.cz.  

6. Can a judgment from a Polish court be enforced directly in the Czech Republic? Yes. Thanks to EU regulations, a judgment issued in any EU member state is directly enforceable in another without needing a special declaration of enforceability. ARROWS can manage the entire process of domesticating your Polish judgment for enforcement by a Czech exekutor. Need legal representation? Write to office@arws.cz.

Don't want to deal with this problem yourself? More than 2,000 clients trust us, and we have been named Law Firm of the Year 2024. Take a look HERE at our references.