Author of the article: JUDr. Vladimír Janošek, ARROWS law firm (office@arws.cz, +420 245 007 740)
The transfer of a part of a plant (branch) is a relatively common but legally complex process in business practice. The most recent decision of the Supreme Court, Case No. 33 Cdo 2383/2023, dated 29 January 2025, emphasises that if a part of a plant is not a separate organisational unit, the transfer of such an "entity" does not trigger the legal consequences that are otherwise associated with the disposal of a branch, which may cause considerable difficulties for entrepreneurs in practice. What exactly does this mean for entrepreneurs and what steps are necessary to ensure that the transaction is legally flawless?
The Civil Code (§ 2183) provides that only a part of a plant that constitutes a separate organizational unit may be transferred. This means that the part of the plant must be:
In practice, it is therefore not enough to transfer, for example, just a particular set of contracts or receivables - the overall continuity of operations must be ensured.
It should therefore not be a purposeful disparate grouping of unrelated items created before the contract is concluded. In such a case, it would not be the purchase of a part of the plant, but the purchase of individual items of the plant under a general sales contract (relating to movable or immovable property), which, however, is subject to a somewhat different legal regime.
The Supreme Court emphasised in its judgment 33 Cdo 2383/2023 that if a part of a factory is not properly specified and designated as a separate organisational unit, it cannot be transferred as a whole together with its debts and claims. In order for the transfer to be effective, it is necessary:
Entrepreneurs should therefore have the transfer documentation prepared carefully by lawyers to avoid any doubt about the entire transaction. Indeed, an inappropriate definition of the branch may lead to completely different legal consequences than the parties originally intended.
If the transfer is not carried out correctly, serious legal consequences may arise:
For example, in that judgment, it was held that the receivables actually transferred may not have effectively passed to the transferee in legal terms, which created considerable legal uncertainty in the contractual relationship.
To make the transfer of part of the plant seamless:
The Supreme Court has made it clear that inaccuracies in the definition of a part of a plant can result in the ineffectiveness of the transfer of its individual items.
If you are planning to transfer a part of a factory (branch), do not expose yourself to the risk of legal complications and have it professionally assessed.