Skip to content
Law

CO-OWNERSHIP INTERESTS IN REAL ESTATE AS A FORM OF INVESTMENT

Given that the new co-owner does not usually share the subject property with the other co-owners, then they, if they do, do so in the vast majority of cases over and above their co-ownership shares. The further procedure then depends on whether or not there is a legal reason for the use of the immovable property by the other co-owners beyond their co-ownership share.

Book cover on efficient contract management by ARROWS law firm.

If there is a legal ground for the use of the immovable by the other co-owners beyond their co-ownership share, this means that there is, for example, a decision of the co-owners (or a court decision, etc.), on the basis of which one (or more) of the co-owners is entitled to use the immovable to an extent smaller or larger than their co-ownership share. Thus, for example, a situation where the other co-owners have agreed that the new co-owner will use the thing to a lesser extent than his/her co-ownership share, or another co-owner(s) to a greater extent than his/her/their co-ownership share.

In such a situation, the new co-owner (as a limited co-owner) is entitled to compensation for the limitation of his/her co-ownership right which results from the mere fact that he/she can use (or benefit from) the thing only to a lesser extent. The right to compensation arises from Article 11(4) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms, as well as from the guarantee of the right of the co-owner to share in the rights and obligations of the common property to the extent of the co-ownership share pursuant to Section 1126 of Act No 89/2012 Coll., Civil Code.

However, significantly more frequent are cases where there is no legal reason for the use of the property by other co-owners beyond their co-ownership share, i.e. there is no agreement of the co-owners or court decision, etc., which would justify the use of the property beyond the co-ownership shares. In such a situation, the new co-owner is entitled to claim unjust enrichment against the other co-owners who use the common immovable property beyond their co-ownership shares, since, as stated above, there is no legal basis for such action.

The standard procedure is then to send a pre-litigation demand to the other co-owners for the recovery of the unjust enrichment, which also includes a quantification of such enrichment. Depending on the response of the other co-owners, either an amicable solution can be negotiated (e.g. regular monthly payments of a certain amount, purchase of the co-owners' shares or a favourable sale of the new co-owner's share) or the claim can be pursued in court (action for unjust enrichment).

About the author

Mgr. Marek Hučík
Mgr. Marek Hučík

Associate, partner

Marek Hučík works at ARROWS as Head of the Prague Centre and is responsible for the management of the Prague office.

Disclaimer:

The information contained in this article is for general informational purposes only and serves as a basic guide to the issue as of 2023. Although we strive for maximum accuracy, laws and their interpretation evolve over time. We are ARROWS Law Firm, a member of the Czech Bar Association (our supervisory authority), and for the maximum security of our clients, we are insured for professional liability with a limit of CZK 400,000,000. To verify the current wording of the regulations and their application to your specific situation, it is necessary to contact ARROWS Law Firm directly (consultation@arws.cz). We are not liable for any damages arising from the independent use of the information in this article without prior individual legal consultation.