Skip to content

Jak ve firmě přistoupit k nastavení spravedlivého odměňování a interních mzdových pravidel

Na obrázku vidíte tým odborníků na spravedlivé odměňování a mzdová pravidla ve firmách.

Key takeaways

Unclear wage policies expose you to risks. Companies without clearly defined internal wage regulations face disputes with employees, inspections, and claims for back pay.
The EU is pushing for pay transparency. The topics of pay equity and the gender pay gap are long-standing priorities in the EU and can lead to reputational and financial consequences, especially for larger employers.
Fair remuneration does not mean equal pay for all. Differences in remuneration are legitimate if they are based on rational, objective, and justifiable grounds, such as seniority, performance, team responsibility, or specialization.
You must be able to justify differences in remuneration. In the event of an employee's objection, you must convincingly demonstrate the objective criteria that led to the different wage, in accordance with the Labour Code and the Anti-Discrimination Act.
The key concepts are equal treatment and comparable work. The legal framework prohibits discrimination based on gender, age, or race and compares the requirements for qualifications, responsibility, complexity, and difficulty of the work.
ARROWS law firm

Why is fair remuneration so crucial for companies?

Added to this are the topics of "pay equity" and the "gender pay gap," which have long been monitored in the EU and can, in many cases, lead to reputational and financial consequences. Furthermore, larger employers face growing demands for remuneration transparency and pressure from trade unions or employee representatives.

Companies without clearly defined internal wage policies unnecessarily expose themselves to the risk of employee disputes, inspections, and claims for back pay. The Prague-based legal team at ARROWS has long specialised in setting up internal wage systems and helps companies protect themselves from these risks in advance.

What do "fair" and "non-discriminatory" remuneration actually mean?

Fair remuneration is not the same as "equal pay for all." It is about ensuring that differences in pay have rational, objective, and justifiable reasons. Legally, we work with concepts such as:

  • "equal treatment" – a ban on discrimination based on gender, age, race, nationality, religion, trade union membership, etc.

  • "comparable work" or "work of equal value" – which involves comparing requirements for qualifications, responsibility, complexity, physical and mental demands, and working conditions.

Differences in remuneration can be legitimate if they are based, for example, on seniority, performance, team responsibility, specialisation, or the labour market. A problem arises when these differences are not documented, are not systematic, or appear discriminatory at first glance.

If an employee were to claim unequal pay, the employer must be able to convincingly demonstrate why the remuneration is different and what objective criteria were used. 

What is the legal framework – and why does it pay to be one step ahead?

The basic legal framework for remuneration in the Czech Republic is based on the Labour Code and the Anti-Discrimination Act. In addition, European law also comes into play, particularly the principle of equal pay for men and women and EU directives aimed at greater wage transparency.

In practice, this means:

  • a ban on discrimination in remuneration (both direct and indirect),

  • the obligation of equal treatment for employees in similar positions,

  • potential obligations related to providing information about remuneration criteria,

  • the risks of litigation over unequal pay, including back pay and compensation for non-pecuniary damage.

The legal regulation of remuneration is gradually tightening, and the pressure for wage transparency will grow – especially for larger employers and international groups. The legal team at ARROWS prepares companies for new obligations in a timely manner and helps adjust wage systems to be sustainable in the long term, both in the Czech Republic and abroad.

FAQ – Legal tips on the remuneration legal framework

1. How large do companies have to be to worry about inspections from the labour inspectorate?

An inspection can happen at any company, but the probability is higher and the consequences more severe for larger employers. 

2. Is there a risk of employee compensation for discriminatory remuneration?

Yes, in addition to back pay, an employee can also claim compensation for non-pecuniary damage for the violation of the right to equal treatment. 
ARROWS law firm

How to start: a wage audit and remuneration mapping in the company

The first step towards "fair" remuneration is usually not writing a directive, but a thorough analysis of the current situation – a so-called wage audit. This typically includes:

  • an overview of employees by job position, team, and seniority,

  • a comparison of wages or salaries for comparable positions,

  • the identification of significant deviations or "anomalies,"

  • linking remuneration to performance, experience, responsibility, and other criteria.

It can also include an anonymised analysis of the gender pay gap – the differences in remuneration between men and women in various categories. From a legal perspective, this is important evidence for a potential defence in future disputes or negotiations with trade unions.

Without a proper wage audit, it is very difficult to set up internal rules that reflect reality and would stand up in a potential dispute.

Wage audit and current situation

Potential problems

How ARROWS helps (consultation@arws.cz)

Undetected inequalities in remuneration – hidden differences between employees in the same position.

Legal wage audit and analysis of differences – identifying at-risk differences and proposing steps for their correction.

Risk of litigation over unequal pay – claims for back pay and compensation.

Legal opinion and strategy – risk assessment, proposal for wage adjustments, documentation for management and HR.

Negative impact on the employer's reputation – dissatisfied employees, leaks of internal information.

Setting up communication and internal documentation – assistance with wage regulations, job descriptions, and employee communication.

Problems during collective bargaining or negotiations with trade unions

Support in negotiations with trade unions and employee councils – preparing arguments, reviewing proposals and contracts.

ARROWS law firm

How to set up internal wage rules and regulations?

After the audit, it is time to formulate clear internal rules. These can take the form of a wage regulation, an internal directive, or part of an employment or collective agreement. It is important that they are:

  • understandable for management, HR, and employees,

  • sufficiently flexible (for example, for individual bonuses),

  • legally enforceable and defensible before an inspectorate or a court.

In practice, it is advisable to:

  • define wage grades or "job grades" for individual positions,

  • clearly describe what influences the amount of the fixed wage (experience, seniority, responsibility),

  • determine the rules for the variable component of the wage and bonuses,

  • manage individual exceptions (for example, for key employees) so that they do not disrupt the basic logic of the system.

The specific wording in wage regulations is crucial – a slightly different sentence can have a major impact in a dispute with an employee or a labour inspection. The Prague-based legal team at ARROWS regularly prepares and revises wage regulations for companies, including harmonising them with employment and collective agreements.

FAQ – Legal tips on wage regulations

1. Does every company have to have a wage regulation?

It is not always mandatory, but for medium and large companies, it is practically essential for maintaining the system and for defence in a dispute. 

2. Can a wage regulation also contain bonus rules?

Yes, it is often practical to have the rules for bonuses and rewards in the same or a related directive.
ARROWS law firm

What role do job descriptions and evaluation criteria play?

Without high-quality job descriptions, it is difficult to defend fair remuneration. A job description is the basis for assessing whether the work is comparable and whether the wage is appropriate for the complexity, responsibility, and demands of the job. In legal terms, this is referred to as the "value of work."

It is important that:

  • job descriptions are up-to-date, not just formal documents "for the file,"

  • they clearly show how positions differ (e.g., level of responsibility, decision-making, team leadership),

  • they are linked to wage grades or ranges.

In addition, performance evaluation criteria play a crucial role. If part of the wage is tied to performance or results, the criteria need to be:

  • known in advance and understandable,

  • measurable and verifiable,

  • non-discriminatory and reasonable.

Without high-quality job descriptions and evaluation criteria, a company is in a significantly weaker position in a dispute with an employee. ARROWS helps clients set up job descriptions and evaluation systems so that they "fit" the reality of operations as well as legal requirements; if you are planning to revise positions, please contact our firm.

Job descriptions and evaluation criteria

Potential problems

How ARROWS helps (consultation@arws.cz)

Outdated or formal job descriptions – they do not reflect reality.

Review and preparation of job descriptions – drafting descriptions that will stand up to an inspection or a court dispute.

Unsystematic differences in remuneration for similar positions

Setting wage grades and remuneration bands – a structured division of positions with a clear link to wages.

Unclear or inappropriate performance criteria – dissatisfied employees, disputes over bonuses.

Legal setup of bonus schemes – preparing rules for performance and rewards that are understandable and enforceable.

ARROWS law firm

How to align fixed wages, bonuses, and benefits?

Fair remuneration is not just about the basic wage. The overall "total reward" package includes:

  • fixed wage,

  • variable component (bonuses, rewards, commissions),

  • benefits in kind (company car, housing),

  • benefits (extra vacation, meal vouchers, training, health packages).

Legally, it can matter significantly whether a benefit is a contractual entitlement (e.g., in an employment contract or directive) or merely a voluntary provision by the employer. Incorrect wording can lead to a benefit that the company intended to be voluntary becoming a legally enforceable entitlement.

The remuneration structure must be clearly described and sustainable in the long term – otherwise, the company can easily fall into the trap of excessive commitments or unclear employee entitlements.

FAQ – Legal tips on bonuses and benefits

1. Is it necessary to have all bonus rules in writing?

It is not always mandatory, but in practice, it is highly recommended – it prevents ambiguities and disputes.

2. Can benefits be changed unilaterally?

It depends on whether the benefits are defined as an employee entitlement or as a voluntary provision by the company. To assess your specific setup, please contact consultation@arws.cz.
ARROWS law firm

How to prevent discrimination and disputes over unequal pay?

Experience shows that disputes over unequal pay do not arise overnight. They usually "simmer beneath the surface" for a long time and come to light when an employee is leaving, has a conflict with a supervisor, or when information about colleagues' wages spreads.

It is essential to:

  • have clear, documented criteria for differences in remuneration,

  • continuously review whether remuneration in practice deviates from the rules,

  • appropriately set up internal communication about remuneration to avoid misunderstandings,

  • respond to employee complaints or questions in a timely manner.

From a legal standpoint, it is important to realise that in a dispute over discrimination or unequal treatment, part of the burden of proof lies with the employer – they must prove that the different remuneration has a legitimate reason and is not discriminatory. This is very difficult without prior documentation.

A properly set up remuneration system significantly reduces the risk of discrimination lawsuits and conflicts with key employees. The legal team at ARROWS regularly represents companies in labour law disputes and negotiations with state authorities and also helps prevent disputes by appropriately setting up legal documents – if you want to avoid such disputes, contact our experts.

Discrimination and litigation

Potential problems

How ARROWS helps (consultation@arws.cz)

Lawsuits for unequal pay and discrimination

Representation in court and administrative proceedings – preparing procedural strategy, negotiating with courts and authorities.

Back pay for several years

Legal risk analysis and proposal of corrective actions – assessing historical data and recommending how to reduce risks.

Labour inspectorate checks and potential fines

Preparation for inspections and representation before authorities – setting up documentation, representation in fine proceedings.

ARROWS law firm

How to communicate the topic of remuneration within the company?

Even a perfectly designed wage system can fail if it is poorly communicated. Transparency does not mean publishing specific wages, but clearly explaining:

  • what the criteria are for being placed in wage bands,

  • what an employee can do to increase their wage (performance, development, role change),

  • how bonuses and the variable component work,

  • how often wage reviews are conducted.

In larger companies, HR departments and line managers often play a significant role. They must know how to work with the established system – which is why it pays to focus on their training as well.

A high-quality legal setup for remuneration should be supplemented with practical training for management and HR so they know how to use and explain the rules in practice.

FAQ – Legal tips on communicating remuneration

1. Do we have to disclose the exact remuneration criteria to employees?

You do not have to disclose specific wages, but clear criteria help prevent disputes and feelings of injustice.

2. Should the wage directive be accessible to all employees?

It is usually advisable for employees to know what governs their remuneration. However, the specific setup depends on the company's structure and internal policy.
ARROWS law firm

International groups, expansion, and different regimes in various countries

For international groups and companies with branches in different countries, the topic of fair remuneration is even more complex. Different legal regulations, varying wage levels in different markets, collective agreements, local customs, and pressure for intra-group fairness all come into play.

Issues that are addressed include, for example:

  • differences in remuneration for similar positions in different countries,

  • harmonising group policies with local laws,

  • requirements of local trade unions or employee councils,

  • the effects of transferring employees between branches.

Without experience in local regulation and without coordination between different legal systems, international groups face an increased risk of disputes and reputational problems in multiple countries simultaneously. ARROWS also provides legal services abroad thanks to its long-established ARROWS International network and handles cases with an international element daily; if you are dealing with setting up remuneration in an international group, get in touch with our experts.

Why you shouldn't tackle this without expert support

The legal regulation of remuneration and internal company practices are more complex than they may seem at first glance. Simple decisions like "we'll just give a raise to this team" or "we'll offer a higher starting salary for new positions" can have unexpected legal consequences over time – especially if they contradict what is in your wage regulations or employment contracts.

Individual steps that seem simple (changing bonuses, introducing a new benefit, reacting to inflation) have hidden procedural details, links to other regulations, collective agreements, and tax and accounting implications. A layperson or an internal team without specialisation often does not see the whole picture, and the risks only become apparent during an inspection or a dispute.

The law firm ARROWS deals with setting up remuneration and internal wage rules daily, which allows it to significantly save clients' time, minimise the risk of errors, and ensure that the system will be sustainable in the long term. ARROWS is insured for damages up to CZK 350,000,000 and regularly collaborates with in-house corporate lawyers to resolve complex and specific matters.

ARROWS' experience from long-term cooperation with more than 150 joint-stock companies, 250 limited liability companies, and dozens of other entities, including municipalities and regions, shows that a well-designed wage system brings not only legal certainty but also a more stable team and a better position in the labour market. If you do not want to risk mistakes, fines, or costly litigation when setting up fair remuneration, you can safely entrust the entire agenda to the law firm ARROWS.

FAQ – Most common legal questions about setting up fair remuneration

1. How often should a company review its remuneration system?

A regular review at least once a year is recommended, or whenever there are significant changes (new positions, restructuring, changes in market conditions). If you haven't updated your system in a long time, now is a good time for a review.

2. Is it enough to have wage grades set up in the HR system if there is no formal directive?

An internal HR system is a good start, but in the event of an inspection or dispute, the existence of clear and approved internal regulations is crucial.

3. How can we defend ourselves if an employee claims they are paid less than a colleague in the same position?

It is crucial to document objective differences in work, performance, or responsibility and their link to pre-defined criteria. If you do not have such documentation, a prompt legal consultation is advisable.

4. Is it possible to set different wage conditions for new and existing employees in the same position?

Theoretically, yes, but the differences must be justified (for example, by the market situation, experience, or responsibility). Unsystematic differences can be perceived as unequal treatment.

5. How should fair remuneration be handled in a group of companies or a holding company?

A combination of a group policy and local wage regulations, harmonised with the laws of individual countries and the practices in individual companies, is usually appropriate.

6. Is it worthwhile to cooperate with an external law firm when setting up remuneration, even if we have in-house HR and lawyers?

For more complex systems and larger companies, the combination of internal knowledge of the environment and external specialisation is very effective – especially for setting up directives, preparing for inspections, and resolving disputes. ARROWS regularly collaborates as a partner to in-house teams; if you are considering such a collaboration, please contact our firm.

DO YOU HAVE MORE QUESTIONS? GET IN TOUCH

ARROWS law firm

About the author

Ing. Veronika Sečková
Ing. Veronika Sečková

Project Manager

At ARROWS, the author specializes in HR and internal development, focusing on professional and efficient handling of HR matters across the Czech Republic. They play a key role in onboarding new colleagues and standardizing HR procedures while also introducing artificial intelligence into internal practices to enhance communication and streamline tasks.

Disclaimer:

The information contained in this article is for general informational purposes only and serves as a basic guide to the issue as of 2026. Although we strive for maximum accuracy, laws and their interpretation evolve over time. We are ARROWS Law Firm, a member of the Czech Bar Association (our supervisory authority), and for the maximum security of our clients, we are insured for professional liability with a limit of CZK 350,000,000. To verify the current wording of the regulations and their application to your specific situation, it is necessary to contact ARROWS Law Firm directly (consultation@arws.cz). We are not liable for any damages arising from the independent use of the information in this article without prior individual legal consultation.