Strategic defense against sanctions imposed by the Office for the Protection of Competition
A strategic defence against competition authority sanctions can significantly reduce the financial and reputational impact of suspected anticompetitive conduct. In this case, ARROWS coordinated communication during an unannounced inspection and prepared a response to the authority's objections supported by legal and economic analysis. The case shows how procedural strategy and competition compliance helped reduce the client's exposure.
Following the notification of objections, we prepared a comprehensive legal and economic statement, supplemented by our own evidence, expert opinions, and an analysis of the relevant market. We also provided the client with strategic recommendations on how to proceed, including an assessment of the possibilities for settlement or use of the leniency program, and set up a competition compliance program for future operations. This combination of legal argumentation and procedural strategy led to a result that significantly limited the possible impact of the proceedings on the client's business.
Facing a similar situation?
We will get back to you within 24 hours.
About the author
Disclaimer:
The information contained in this article is for general informational purposes only and serves as a basic guide to the issue as of 2026. Although we strive for maximum accuracy, laws and their interpretation evolve over time. We are ARROWS Law Firm, a member of the Czech Bar Association (our supervisory authority), and for the maximum security of our clients, we are insured for professional liability with a limit of CZK 350,000,000. To verify the current wording of the regulations and their application to your specific situation, it is necessary to contact ARROWS Law Firm directly (consultation@arws.cz). We are not liable for any damages arising from the independent use of the information in this article without prior individual legal consultation.