Successful defense of investor rights against broker misconduct
An investor who loses money because of broker misconduct may still recover the loss if the broker breached duties owed to the client. In an ARROWS case, the Financial Arbitrator reviewed the broker’s conduct and awarded compensation for the full amount invested. This case study explains how the claim was built, why the evidence and legal argument mattered and how the right procedure can turn an investment loss into a recoverable claim.
The law firm's legal team prepared and filed a motion with the financial arbitrator, who reviewed the broker's conduct and assessed whether all obligations towards the client had been fulfilled. The result was a decision by the financial arbitrator to grant the client's motion and award him compensation for the entire amount invested.
Mgr. Jáchym Petřík, a specialist in financial law and investment services, and JUDr. Zuzana Liškařová, an expert in contractual matters and representing clients in court, played a key role in resolving the case. Their combination of precise legal reasoning and practical experience in the field of investment was the key to the success of the dispute.
A big thank you goes to Mgr. Jáchym Petřík and JUDr. Zuzana Liškařová, whose expertise and thoroughness were crucial to successfully obtaining full compensation for the client's funds.
About the author
Disclaimer:
The information contained in this article is for general informational purposes only and serves as a basic guide to the issue as of 2026. Although we strive for maximum accuracy, laws and their interpretation evolve over time. We are ARROWS Law Firm, a member of the Czech Bar Association (our supervisory authority), and for the maximum security of our clients, we are insured for professional liability with a limit of CZK 350,000,000. To verify the current wording of the regulations and their application to your specific situation, it is necessary to contact ARROWS Law Firm directly (consultation@arws.cz). We are not liable for any damages arising from the independent use of the information in this article without prior individual legal consultation.