Skip to content
Law

How to proceed in case of parental disagreement during school enrollment

April is the month of enrollment for compulsory school attendance. What to do and how to proceed when parents cannot agree on the choice of a primary school?

How to proceed in case of parental disagreement regarding school enrollment

Key takeaways

Obtain a court order to substitute the other parent's consent. If you and the other parent cannot agree on the choice of school for your child, file a motion with the court to substitute their consent for the school application pursuant to Section 877 of the Civil Code.
Act promptly, as court proceedings take time. The motion to substitute consent must be filed well in advance to ensure the court's decision is available by the time of enrollment in the first grade.
The court will appoint a guardian for the child. In proceedings to substitute a parent's consent, the court will appoint a guardian for the child to represent their best interests.
The court will also rule on enrollments that have already occurred. If each parent enrolls the child in a different school, the court will resolve the disagreement and decide which school the child will attend for their compulsory education.
ARROWS law firm

Choosing a School and Parental Disagreements

In other words, the choice of school is in the hands of the parents, and if a non-catchment school has enough capacity to accept a pupil with permanent residence outside its district, it may do so. Ideally, parents will agree on a school for their future first-grader or reach an agreement before enrolment. But what if they don't?

With the current high divorce rate, situations arise where parents simply cannot agree on (among other things) the choice of primary school and are unwilling or unable to reach a compromise. However, disagreements over the choice of school can also occur within a marriage, where each parent may have a different idea about their child's educational path.

Court Resolution: Motion to Substitute the Consent of the Other Parent

The issue of school selection in cases of parental disagreement was addressed by the Regional Court in Prague in its decision Ref. No. 28 Co 158/2013 of 18 April 2013 (the "Decision"), in which the court stated, inter alia, that if parents cannot agree on which primary school their child will attend, the parent who proposes to enrol the child in the catchment primary school should file a motion with the court to substitute the consent of the other parent for the submission of the application for enrolment in the primary school, with sufficient time in advance so that a court decision substituting the consent of the disagreeing parent is available at the time of enrolment in the first grade of primary school.

Therefore, if parental disagreements persist in such a significant matter as starting primary school, or if one parent bypasses or intends to bypass the other in this decision-making, the only recommendation is to turn to the court pursuant to Section 877 of the Civil Code with a motion to substitute the consent of the other parent for the submission of the application for enrolment in primary school.

The competent court is the district court in the district of the minor's general court, and the court will appoint a guardian for the child for these proceedings. If the court grants the parent's motion, the operative part of the court's decision typically states that consent is granted on behalf of the other parent for the submission of the application for enrolment for compulsory schooling at the primary school. Although in matters of court care for minors the court decides with the utmost expedition, these steps must be taken in a timely manner so that a court decision substituting the consent of the disagreeing parent is available at the time of enrolment in the first grade of primary school.

DO YOU NEED LEGAL HELP?

Get in touch — we're happy to help.

ARROWS law firm

What if the child is enrolled at two different schools?

But what if each parent acts on their own and the child has been enrolled by each parent at two different schools, and therefore substituting the consent of the other parent for the submission of the application for compulsory school attendance is no longer relevant?

According to the above-mentioned Decision, in such a case, the disagreement between the parents will be resolved by the court, which will decide which school the minor child will attend for compulsory schooling. The Regional Court in Prague stated in the Decision that in making this decision, not only the issue of the school's catchment area should be taken into account, but also the wishes of the future first-grader or, for example, the need to commute to school (and thus wake up early) versus a school within walking distance.

Risks and Sanctions

How ARROWS can help (consultation@arws.cz)

Inability of parents to agree on school choice

We mediate out-of-court negotiations between parents and prepare parental responsibility agreements to avoid lengthy court disputes.

Unilateral enrolment without consent or double enrolment

We will draft and file a motion to substitute the consent of the other parent under Section 877 of the Civil Code or a motion for a decision on which school the child will actually attend.

Missing court deadlines before the enrolment date

We will take on representation without delay, draw up a motion with an emphasis on the speed of the proceedings, and propose procedural steps to ensure a timely court decision.

Suspension of administrative proceedings by the headteacher and the catchment default

We will legally represent the parent in dealings with the headteacher and before the court, and we will advocate for a solution that best reflects the child's own best interests and wishes.

ARROWS law firm

Frequently Asked Questions about Court Resolution of Parental Disagreements on School Choice

1. What should I do if the other parent enrolled our child in a different school without my consent?

  • If a unilateral enrolment has occurred or the child has been enrolled at two different schools, you must immediately file a motion with the district court to substitute the other parent's consent (Section 877 of the Czech Civil Code), or a motion for the court to directly determine which school the child will attend.

2. What criteria does the court use to decide which primary school the child will ultimately attend?

  • The court does not only consider the catchment area. It takes into account the child's overall best interests, their own wishes and preferential abilities, transport accessibility and the need for an early commute, and possibly continuity with siblings or extracurricular activities.

3. What is the latest date to file a motion with the court for the child to be able to start the 1st grade on time?

  1. The motion must be filed as far in advance as possible (ideally even before the enrolment dates). Although court proceedings in matters of care for minors are expedited, the process of appointing a guardian and taking evidence requires time so that a final judgment can be delivered before September 1st.

ARROWS law firm

School Enrolment as an Administrative Proceeding and Application Signature

The procedure for admitting a child to primary education is an administrative proceeding, and the headteacher's decision in such a case is an administrative decision. The headteacher is an authorised official in the proceeding, acting as an executor of public authority. The submission of an application for enrolment for compulsory schooling initiates an administrative proceeding upon request within the meaning of Section 44(1) of the Administrative Procedure Code.

Connected with the obligation to submit an application for enrolment for compulsory schooling is a very common question from parents as to whether it must be signed by both parents. According to Section 892(2) of the Civil Code, parents represent the child jointly, but each of them may act individually. This provision is followed by Section 876(2) of the Civil Code, according to which if one of the parents acts alone in a matter concerning the child towards a third party who is in good faith, it is presumed that they are acting with the consent of the other parent.

There is therefore a presumption that the parents are acting in agreement. Thus, the primary assumption is that the parents' relationship is positive, that they are in unison, and that the will of only one of them is expressed externally. Therefore, if the school management has no information about parental disagreements on the issue of starting primary school, its good faith can be presumed, and in such a case, the school will accept an application for enrolment for compulsory schooling that is signed by only one of the parents.

DO YOU NEED LEGAL HELP?

Get in touch — we're happy to help.

ARROWS law firm

Procedure for the Headteacher upon Discovering a Parent's Disagreement

However, if the headteacher is informed of the other parent's disagreement, then good faith can no longer be assumed. In such a case, the headteacher should suspend the initiated administrative proceedings pursuant to Section 64(1)(c) of the Administrative Procedure Code and invite the parents to file a motion with the court to substitute the consent of the other parent for the submission of the application for enrolment in the primary school.

If no court decision is issued by the day of the start of compulsory schooling (either because neither parent has filed a motion with the court and therefore no proceedings are pending, or because a motion has been filed but the substitution of the other parent's consent has not been decided by the start of school) and the young preschooler is therefore not enrolled in any primary school, the child will automatically begin compulsory schooling at their catchment school.

Frequently Asked Questions about School Enrolment and Administrative Proceedings

1. Is it legally required for both parents to sign the application for 1st-grade enrolment?

  • It is not a strict condition if the headteacher has no information about a disagreement. According to Sections 876 and 892 of the Czech Civil Code, the good faith of third parties is presumed, and there is a presumption that one parent acts with the consent of the other. The school will therefore also accept an application with a single signature.

2. How does a headteacher react if one parent informs them of their disagreement with the choice of school?

  • The moment the headteacher is officially notified of the other parent's disagreement, they lose their good faith. They will suspend the administrative proceedings for the child's admission under Section 64 of the Administrative Procedure Code and call on the parents to resolve the disagreement through the courts.

3. What happens if the court does not decide on the choice of school before the beginning of the school year?

  • If a final court decision is not available by September 1st and the proceedings at the selected schools remain suspended, the so-called catchment default applies. The child will automatically begin compulsory schooling at their catchment primary school according to their permanent residence.

4. Which court is competent to file a motion to substitute a parent's consent?

  • The competent court is the district court (in Prague, the circuit court) in whose district the minor child has their actual residence. The court will automatically appoint a conflict-of-interest guardian (usually the OSPOD - Authority for Social and Legal Protection of Children) for the child for these proceedings.

5. Do parents have to resolve the choice of school in court even if they are divorced and the child is in the custody of one of them?

  • Yes. The choice of a primary school is considered a significant matter for the minor child, which falls under the parental responsibility of both parents. The custodial parent does not have the right to decide on the school independently without the consent of the other parent, unless parental responsibility has been limited by a court.

6. Can a disagreement about school choice be resolved without going to court?

Yes. The quickest and least burdensome solution is out-of-court negotiation with the participation of lawyers for both parties or the use of professional mediation, where a parental agreement can be reached, thus preventing the enrolment process at the school from being blocked.

DO YOU HAVE MORE QUESTIONS? GET IN TOUCH

ARROWS law firm

About the author

Mgr. Vendula Růžková, LL.M., MBA
Mgr. Vendula Růžková, LL.M., MBA

Associate

Mgr. Vendula Růžková, LL.M., MBA is an experienced attorney at ARROWS, specializing in commercial and civil litigation. Her focus lies in procedural law and the development of litigation strategies aimed at achieving concrete results and protecting clients’ business interests.

Disclaimer:

The information contained in this article is for general informational purposes only and serves as a basic guide to the issue as of 2026. Although we strive for maximum accuracy, laws and their interpretation evolve over time. We are ARROWS Law Firm, a member of the Czech Bar Association (our supervisory authority), and for the maximum security of our clients, we are insured for professional liability with a limit of CZK 350,000,000. To verify the current wording of the regulations and their application to your specific situation, it is necessary to contact ARROWS Law Firm directly (consultation@arws.cz). We are not liable for any damages arising from the independent use of the information in this article without prior individual legal consultation.