Skip to content

How to Properly Handle Neighbor Disputes and Objections from Parties to Proceedings in Real Estate Development

Neighbour disputes and objections from parties to the proceedings are among the most common causes of delays for development projects in the Czech Republic. A single unfounded objection can delay a building permit by months, or in worse cases, even years, and cost the developer millions of crowns. In this article, you will learn how to prevent these complications, how to communicate correctly with the affected owners, and how to effectively defend your rights in permit proceedings and before the courts.

The picture shows attorneys providing legal counsel in the areas of neighbourly disputes and development proceedings.

Key takeaways

Do not underestimate objections from neighbours, even if they seem unfounded. The building authority is obliged to address every objection in the reasoning of its decision, which can prolong the permitting process for your project.
The circle of parties to the proceedings is broad and includes more than just the applicant. Parties may include owners of adjacent land and buildings, persons with rights in rem to them (e.g., an easement), and the affected municipality, provided their rights are directly affected.
A direct effect on rights means a specific infringement upon the rights of the owner of an adjacent property. This may include, for example, excessive immissions such as noise, dust, or overshadowing, impairment of access to the land, or a reduction in the utility value of the neighbouring property.
Objections may relate to the project documentation, the method of construction, future use, or the requirements of the public authorities concerned. It is crucial to identify and address them in a timely and effective manner to minimise the risk of an appeal.
ARROWS law firm

Why are objections from participants so crucial for a development project?

A developer must anticipate that neighbors may raise objections concerning the project documentation, construction methods, future use, or requirements of the authorities involved. These objections may not always be factually justified, yet the building authority is obliged to address each one individually in the reasoning of its decision.

The lawyers at ARROWS law firm specialize in representing developers in permit proceedings and routinely handle objections from participants. Thanks to a decade of experience with complex projects, they can minimize the risk of appeals and ensure the entire process runs smoothly. For an immediate solution to your situation, write to us at consultation@arws.cz.

You can find more detailed information about this area of legal assistance on our page HERE.

FAQ – Legal tips on objections in construction proceedings

1. Who can be a party to construction proceedings and raise objections?

In addition to the applicant, parties primarily include the owners of adjacent land and buildings whose rights may be directly affected by the construction, as well as persons with real rights to these properties (such as holders of an easement) and the affected municipality. If you have doubts about whether the circle of participants has been correctly determined, contact us at consultation@arws.cz.​

2. What does 'direct infringement of a participant's rights' mean?

This is not just any theoretical infringement, but a specific interference with the rights of the owner of an adjacent property – for example, if the construction causes excessive emissions (noise, dust, shade), worsens access to the land, or reduces the utility value of the neighboring property. ​
ARROWS law firm

What objections can participants realistically raise?

The scope of objections is limited by law, but it is still broad. Participants can raise objections in three basic categories:

Procedural objections are directed against errors made by the building authority – for example, that they were not duly notified of the start of the proceedings, that they were not allowed to inspect the file, or that their arguments were not heard at the oral hearing.​

Public law objections concern the compliance of the construction with public interests – with the zoning plan, with health and environmental protection requirements, with technical standards, or with the decisions of the authorities involved. The building authority is obliged to assess these objections according to the general requirements for construction and the binding opinions of the relevant authorities.​

Civil law objections involve private law relationships between participants – for example, claims that the construction encroaches on another's land, that a right of way is not secured, that an easement for utility networks is missing, or that the construction will cause unreasonable emissions on the neighboring property.

The situation is more complicated with civil law objections. The building authority will first try to lead the participants to an agreement. If an agreement is not possible and the objection concerns, for example, the existence or extent of an ownership right, the building authority must refer the relevant participant to court and suspend the proceedings. It can only continue after a final court decision. These delays can last for years and significantly increase the cost of the entire project.​

The ARROWS law firm has extensive experience in negotiating agreements between developers and participants in proceedings, thereby preventing lengthy court disputes. Do you need legal assistance? Contact us at consultation@arws.cz.

Risks and Penalties

How ARROWS helps (consultation@arws.cz)

Insufficiently addressing objections from participants can lead to the cancellation of the building permit by the appellate body and delay the project by months or even years.

Comprehensive representation in zoning and construction proceedings – we will ensure all objections are properly addressed at the first instance. 

An overlooked participant in the proceedings – if the building authority fails to include all affected owners in the proceedings, there is a risk of the decision being annulled and having to start over.

Thorough analysis of the circle of participants and affected persons – we prevent the omission of participants. 

Procedural errors in handling objections – failure to meet deadlines, incomplete delivery of notifications – a reason for a successful appeal.

Legal preparation and review of documents for the building authority – we prevent procedural defects and speed up the permitting process.

Neighbor objections can challenge the project documentation, the method of use of the building, or the impacts on the surroundings (noise, dust, shade).

Preparation of contracts with affected owners – easements, compensation agreements, mediation of disputes with participants.

Additional lawsuits from neighbors – actions to protect ownership rights, actions to halt the construction.

Representation in appeal and court proceedings – defense of the building permit and protection of the developer against unfounded lawsuits. 

ARROWS law firm

How to prevent neighbor disputes during the project preparation phase?

Prevention is always cheaper and faster than resolving disputes. An experienced developer knows that an investment in the legal preparation of a project will pay for itself many times over by shortening the permitting process and eliminating the risk of delays.

A thorough legal due diligence of the land will reveal existing easements, liens, pre-emption rights, lease relationships, or court disputes related to the land or neighboring properties. The lawyers at ARROWS routinely conduct in-depth property audits for development projects of all sizes.​

Identifying all affected owners and their rights is another key step. The developer should find out in a timely manner who the owners of adjacent plots are, whether utility networks run to them, and whether there are any easements or protection zones. Any uncertainty in this area can later cause serious complications.​

Negotiating with owners even before submitting the permit application can significantly speed up the entire process. If the developer discusses the plan with them in advance, clarifies any concerns, and offers reasonable compensation or solutions, it minimizes the risk of objections in the proceedings themselves.​

DO YOU NEED LEGAL HELP?

Get in touch — we're happy to help.

ARROWS law firm

Securing easements and servitudes is essential if the developer needs to use neighboring land for construction – for example, for running utility networks, an access road, or temporary occupations during construction. Without these rights, the project can be completely blocked.​

The ARROWS law firm provides developers with comprehensive legal services starting from the land acquisition phase. We prepare contractual documentation, secure easements, and negotiate with owners and the authorities involved. Connect with us at consultation@arws.cz and get a tailor-made legal solution.

The reality, however, is that even with careful preparation, not all objections can be prevented. Some objections are motivated by subjective reasons or an attempt to obtain financial compensation from the developer. It is in these situations that the experience of the ARROWS law firm in resolving conflict situations is invaluable.

FAQ – Legal tips for preventing neighbor disputes

1. Is it better to negotiate with neighbors directly or through a lawyer?

It depends on the situation and the personalities involved. Often, a combination is most effective – the developer pre-negotiates the basic parameters, and the lawyer then prepares the contractual documentation and ensures that the agreement is legally binding and enforceable. If you are facing a similar problem, contact us at consultation@arws.cz.​

2. Can we offer neighbors financial compensation for their consent to the construction?

Yes, this is a completely legitimate solution. Compensation can take the form of a one-time payment, the establishment of an easement for a fee, modification of the project according to the neighbor's requirements, or other mutually beneficial solutions. ​
ARROWS law firm

What to do when the building authority improperly handles objections?

Insufficiently addressing objections is one of the most common defects in a building authority's decision. If the authority downplays an objection, fails to provide a clear response, or ignores it completely, it creates grounds for a successful appeal by a party to the proceedings.​

The developer should actively cooperate with the building authority and ensure that all objections are addressed in sufficient detail and with proper justification. In practice, this means:​

  • Monitoring the course of the proceedings and knowing the content of all submitted objections. The developer has the right to inspect the file and familiarize themselves with the documents for the decision.

  • Providing the building authority with materials to address the objections – for example, expert opinions, technical reports, acoustic studies, or other evidence proving that the objections are unfounded.

  • Being prepared for appeal proceedings. Even with the best preparation, one of the participants may file an appeal. The developer should have arguments and evidence ready for the appellate body.​

The ARROWS law firm provides comprehensive representation throughout the entire permitting process, including communication with the building authority and preparation of documents for the proper handling of objections. We have experience with dozens of development projects annually and know how to argue effectively before authorities and courts. 

It is necessary to realize that appeal proceedings can take more than a year, depending on the workload of the regional authority. During this time, the project is completely blocked, the developer pays interest on loans, and cannot start construction or sell units. Therefore, it is crucial to minimize the risk of an appeal at the first-instance proceedings.​

What role do neighbor rights and emissions play in development?

Section 1013 of the Czech Civil Code prohibits an owner from affecting a neighboring property with waste, water, smoke, dust, gas, odor, light, shade, noise, vibrations, and other similar effects (emissions) to an extent that is unreasonable for the local conditions and substantially restricts the usual use of the property.​

When designing a building, the developer must respect the rights of neighbors and ensure that future operation does not generate excessive emissions. Otherwise, there is a risk of:​

  • Objections within the construction proceedings, which may lead to the rejection of the application or the imposition of additional conditions.

  • Civil lawsuits to protect ownership rights, by which a neighbor can demand a halt to the construction or the removal of an already built structure.

  • Lawsuits for damages if the operation of the building causes harm to neighbors – for example, a decrease in the value of their property.​

The assessment of the reasonableness of emissions always depends on the specific local conditions. Higher emissions will be tolerated in an industrial zone than in a residential area. The court considers the character of the locality, the intensity and duration of the emissions, whether the building complies with technical standards and hygiene limits, and other circumstances.​

The lawyers at ARROWS collaborate with designers and technical specialists to ensure that a development project complies with both hygiene limits and neighbor rights. We prepare expert opinions that demonstrate that the future building will not burden the surroundings beyond the permissible level. For an immediate solution to your situation, write to us at consultation@arws.cz.

DO YOU NEED LEGAL HELP?

Get in touch — we're happy to help.

ARROWS law firm

Direct and indirect emissions – a key difference

The law distinguishes between two types of emissions. Indirect emissions (noise, dust, odor, shade) originate on the source property and spread naturally. These are prohibited only if they exceed a level that is reasonable for the local conditions.​

Direct emissions involve the owner intentionally directing emissions onto another's property – for example, by discharging wastewater, depositing waste, or directing smoke. Direct emissions are categorically prohibited regardless of their intensity, unless they are based on a special legal ground (such as an easement).​

A developer must ensure that their project does not cause direct emissions onto neighboring properties. If it is necessary to run utility networks or wastewater pipes across a neighboring property, an easement must be secured.​

Risks and Penalties

How ARROWS helps (consultation@arws.cz)

Emissions (noise, dust, smoke, shade) exceeding the level reasonable for local conditions – a neighbor can file a civil lawsuit to stop the activity.

Legal analysis of neighbor relations and emission risks – prevention of future disputes. 

The building encroaches on a neighboring property or violates setback distances – risk of a lawsuit for the removal of the building.

Preparation of project documentation in cooperation with designers to respect legal limits and neighbor rights.

Absence of easements for utility networks running across neighboring properties – a legal minefield blocking the project.

Contractual securing of easements, servitudes, and rights of way – comprehensive legal service from analysis to registration in the Land Registry. 

Unresolved neighbor relations can lead to blocking access to the property, refusal of necessary cooperation or consents.

Mediation and negotiation with neighbors – we reach an agreement and prevent court disputes.

ARROWS law firm

Can you defend yourself against a neighbor's building permit in court?

Even a developer can be in the position of a neighbor affected by another's construction plan. The key principle is that an owner cannot successfully sue a neighbor to halt construction after a building permit has become final if they could have raised their objections in the construction proceedings but failed to do so.

In other words: if you were a party to the proceedings and did not raise objections or appeal against the building permit, you lose the ability to defend yourself against the construction with a civil lawsuit. The court will assume that the builder has a valid public law title and that you should have raised the reasons why the construction should not be permitted during the permit proceedings.

An exception is in cases where the construction actually violates your ownership right in a way that the building authority could not assess – for example, if the building physically encroaches on your land or if the developer has not secured the necessary rights to your land for the construction.​

The ARROWS law firm represents clients both as developers and as owners affected by another's construction plan. Thanks to experience from both sides, we know how to effectively defend our clients' rights and achieve the best possible results. Do not hesitate to contact our office at consultation@arws.cz.

How does an appeal against a building permit work?

An appeal is the primary remedy in administrative proceedings. Any party to the proceedings has the right to file an appeal within 15 days of the delivery of the building authority's decision. The appeal is filed with the building authority that issued the decision, but it is decided by the superior authority – usually the regional authority.​

The grounds for an appeal can be both procedural and substantive:​

  • Procedural grounds include insufficient fact-finding, omission of a party to the proceedings, failure to meet deadlines, incomplete or missing resolution of objections, and violation of the right to be heard.

  • Substantive grounds consist of incorrect legal assessment – for example, the conclusion that the construction is in compliance with the zoning plan when it is not, or that emissions will be reasonable even though expert opinions indicate otherwise.​

The appellate body has several options: it can confirm the decision, amend it, annul it and return it for a new hearing, or annul it and terminate the proceedings. If the regional authority annuls the decision and returns it for a new hearing, the entire process is repeated, and the developer loses months or even years.

FAQ – Legal tips on appeal proceedings

1. How long do appeal proceedings take?

The law sets deadlines for decisions, but in practice, it depends on the workload of the regional authority. Appeal proceedings can take from six months to over a year. ​

2. What can we do during the appeal proceedings?

The developer cannot start construction until the decision becomes final. However, they can prepare documents for the regional authority, communicate with the appellant, and try to reach an out-of-court settlement that would lead to the withdrawal of the appeal. Write to consultation@arws.cz and we will help you.​
ARROWS law firm

What are the alternatives to a lawsuit – mediation and agreement?

Lawsuits are always lengthy, costly, and their outcome is uncertain. It is much more effective to reach an out-of-court agreement with neighbors or other affected persons.

Mediation is a structured process in which an independent mediator helps the parties to a dispute find a mutually acceptable solution. Mediation is voluntary, confidential, and often faster than court proceedings. In development, mediation is used mainly for resolving neighbor disputes, negotiating compensation, or setting the terms of cooperation.​

The advantage of mediation is that both parties have control over the outcome – it is not the court or an authority that decides, but the parties themselves. A mediation agreement can include not only financial compensation but also project modifications, developer commitments (e.g., regarding maintenance or future use), or any other solutions the parties agree on.​

Easements and contractual arrangements are another way to secure the consent of neighbors. The developer can offer to establish an easement (e.g., a right of way for a neighbor across the developer's land), financial compensation for a favorable opinion, modification of the project according to the neighbor's requirements, or other consideration.​

The ARROWS law firm facilitates mediation between developers and affected parties and prepares contractual documentation that ensures the legal enforceability of agreements. We have experience in negotiating agreements even in challenging cases where consensus seemed impossible. Connect with us at consultation@arws.cz and get a tailor-made legal solution.

It is important to realize that mediation and negotiation require time and often compromises on both sides. The developer must be willing to listen to the concerns of neighbors and look for solutions that will be acceptable to everyone. On the other hand, the time and costs devoted to an agreement are incomparably less than the losses caused by lengthy court disputes or a blocked project.​

These clients trust us

České dráhy
MONETA Money Bank
Český svaz ledního hokeje
ARROWS law firm

The complexity of legal issues in development – why entrust the solution to experts?

At first glance, it may seem that securing a building permit is a relatively straightforward process. The reality, however, is far more complex. Construction law is interconnected with civil law, administrative law, environmental law, and corporate law. Each step has its procedural requirements, deadlines, and legal pitfalls.

Example: A developer acquires land and plans to build an apartment building. A seemingly simple matter. In practice, however, they must ensure:

  • Due diligence of the land – checking ownership rights, easements, liens, lease relationships, the zoning plan, protection zones, and possible contamination.

  • A change to the zoning plan if the land is not designated for the required purpose of use.

  • An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) if it is a larger project.

  • Negotiations with the authorities involved and obtaining their binding opinions.

  • Negotiations with the owners of neighboring properties and securing easements for utility networks, access roads, or temporary occupations during construction.

  • Zoning proceedings and subsequently construction proceedings, including the settlement of participants' objections.

  • Contracts with suppliers, designers, and construction supervision.

  • Securing financing and communication with banks.

  • Sale of units and transfers of ownership.​

Each of these steps requires specialized legal knowledge and experience. A layperson who tries to manage the entire process on their own or with minimal legal support risks serious mistakes that can fundamentally jeopardize or increase the cost of the project.

The ARROWS law firm provides comprehensive legal services for development projects from land acquisition to final inspection and sale of units. Our team has deep knowledge of construction law, real estate law, administrative law, and corporate law. We handle development projects on a daily basis, which allows us to significantly shorten the time needed to secure permits and minimize the risk of errors.

We are insured for damages up to CZK 500,000,000, which means maximum security for our clients. In the event of an error on our part, we have sufficient coverage to compensate for damages. Do not hesitate to contact our office at consultation@arws.cz.

Risks and Penalties

How ARROWS helps (consultation@arws.cz)

Extension of the permitting process due to objections and appeals – loss of 1-3 years, increase in project costs.

Prevention through thorough legal preparation of the project from the land acquisition phase – we will save you years of delays.

Fines for construction in violation of or without a permit – up to CZK 1,000,000 according to Section 301 of the Building Act.

Legal advice in accordance with current legislation – minimizing the risk of fines and penalties. 

Blocking of project financing – banks suspend loans during legal disputes over a building permit.

Communication with banks and investors – legal support in securing financing.

Loss of investor and partner confidence due to legal uncertainty of the project.

Comprehensive legal services for developers – from due diligence to final inspection.

ARROWS law firm

The international dimension of development projects and the ARROWS International network

Modern development projects often involve international elements – foreign investors, suppliers from abroad, the sale of units to foreigners, or projects carried out simultaneously in several countries. In these cases, it is essential to provide legal services that cover not only Czech law but also foreign jurisdictions.

The ARROWS law firm is part of the ARROWS International network, which we have been building for more than ten years. Thanks to this network, we are able to provide legal services outside the Czech Republic and handle cases with an international element on a daily basis. Whether you need to secure legal documentation for foreign investors, resolve tax issues of cross-border transactions, or obtain legal advice for projects in other countries, we can help you.

Our experience with international projects includes not only residential and commercial development but also industrial buildings, logistics centers, and energy projects. The lawyers at ARROWS understand the specific requirements of developers with an international scope and can connect the legal frameworks of different countries.

If you are planning an investment abroad, looking for an international partner, or need legal services for foreign clients, contact us at consultation@arws.cz.

Practical cases – what can threaten a developer?

Case 1: An overlooked party to the proceedings

A developer obtained a building permit for an apartment building. The project was running according to plan, and construction had begun. Six months later, the owner of a neighboring property came forward, claiming he had never been a party to the proceedings, even though his land was immediately adjacent to the construction site. The court agreed with him, and the building permit was annulled. The developer had to stop construction, deal with loan commitments, and start the entire process over again – this time with the correct circle of participants. The total loss: more than 18 months and millions of crowns.

Solution: A thorough analysis of the circle of participants at the very beginning of the proceedings and checking that everyone has been duly notified. The lawyers at ARROWS have experience in identifying all affected owners and ensuring that no one is overlooked. For an immediate solution to your situation, write to us at consultation@arws.cz.

Case 2: Missing easement for utility networks

A developer built a residential project and only discovered during the final inspection that the sewer connection ran through a neighboring property for which he had not secured an easement. The owner of the neighboring property demanded either the removal of the connection or financial compensation in the hundreds of thousands. The developer had to act under pressure because without a functional sewer system, he could not get the project approved or sell the units. In the end, he paid double the usual price for establishing the easement.

Solution: Securing all necessary easements during the project preparation phase. The ARROWS law firm prepares complete contractual documentation for easements and ensures their registration in the Land Registry. 

Case 3: Excessive emissions and a neighbor's lawsuit

An apartment building was built and approved, but a neighbor filed a lawsuit to protect his property rights, claiming that the building cast an excessive shadow on his land and reduced the value of his property. The court ordered an expert report, which proved that the shading indeed exceeded the level customary in the given location. The developer had to pay the neighbor compensation and also bear the costs of a long court proceeding.

Solution: Prevention through an analysis of the building's impact on the surroundings during the design phase, or negotiating an agreement with neighbors before construction begins. The lawyers at ARROWS collaborate with technical specialists and prepare expert opinions that demonstrate the project's compliance with legal limits.

DO YOU NEED LEGAL HELP?

Get in touch — we're happy to help.

ARROWS law firm

Other cooperation opportunities – acquisitions, project sales, and investment opportunities

The ARROWS law firm not only legally secures some projects but also implements them itself, including the possibility of their purchase or arranging their sale. If you are looking for a joint venture partner, an investor for your project, or an interesting investment opportunity, we can help you connect with suitable entities from our portfolio.

Our portfolio includes more than 150 joint-stock companies, 250 limited liability companies, and 50 municipalities and regions for which we provide long-term legal services. Thanks to this experience, the ARROWS law firm can not only handle the legal side of a project but also provide consultations for investors and entrepreneurs who are looking for suitable partners or opportunities for acquisitions or exits.

We handle some of these activities with our partner, SHARE DEAL Office, which focuses on supporting transactions and connecting investors. 

If you have an interesting development project, are looking for capital, or a business partner for a purchase or sale, please contact us. Our lawyers have experience not only with the legal framework of these transactions but also with their practical implementation – thanks to this, they can advise clients on issues of economic feasibility and negotiating terms. Contact us at consultation@arws.cz.

Why are speed and quality essential in development?

Every month of project delay means a loss for the developer. Interest on loans continues to accrue, company administration costs rise, the sale of units is delayed, and thus the return on investment. In a competitive environment, a delay can also mean that another project gets to the market earlier and "takes a bite" out of the demand.

The ARROWS law firm prides itself on speed and high quality. Thanks to our experience from providing long-term services to hundreds of clients, we know how to work effectively with authorities, how to prepare documents so that they meet all requirements the first time, and how to minimize the risk of delays caused by procedural defects or objections.

We regularly partner with corporate lawyers to handle special matters. Many development companies have their own in-house lawyers who handle routine agendas, but for specific areas – such as construction proceedings, negotiations with authorities, resolving neighbor disputes, or international transactions – they cooperate with an external law firm. ARROWS is the ideal partner for these situations.

If you do not want to risk mistakes, damages, or fines, you can safely entrust the entire matter to the ARROWS law firm. Just contact us at consultation@arws.cz.

Conclusion – entrust the legal resolution of neighbor disputes and objections to the experts at ARROWS

Neighbor disputes and objections from participants in proceedings are a reality in development that every developer must anticipate. The difference between a successful project and a loss-making enterprise often lies in how well the project is legally prepared and how effectively conflicts with affected parties are resolved.

The ARROWS law firm provides comprehensive legal services for development projects of all sizes. Our services include:

  • Legal due diligence of land and risk identification at the acquisition stage.

  • Preparation of contractual documentation – purchase agreements, future purchase agreements, agreements on the establishment of easements.

  • Negotiations with owners of neighboring properties and securing their consents or compensation agreements.

  • Representation in zoning and construction proceedings, including communication with building authorities and relevant bodies.

  • Preparation of documents for settling participants' objections and preventing appeals.

  • Representation in appeal proceedings and administrative judiciary.

  • Mediation and out-of-court settlement of disputes with neighbors and other affected parties.

  • Legal advice on acquisitions, joint ventures, and international projects.

We pride ourselves on speed and high quality. Our portfolio includes more than 150 joint-stock companies, 250 limited liability companies, and 50 municipalities and regions for which we provide long-term legal services. Thanks to this experience, the ARROWS law firm can significantly shorten the time needed to secure permits and minimize the risk of errors.

We are insured for damages up to CZK 500,000,000, which means maximum security for our clients. We regularly partner with corporate lawyers to handle special matters. We handle development projects on a daily basis and have deep knowledge of construction law, real estate law, and international law.

If you do not want to risk mistakes, damages, fines, or project delays, entrust the legal resolution of neighbor disputes and participants' objections to the experts at the ARROWS law firm. Contact us at consultation@arws.cz and get a tailor-made legal solution.

FAQ – Most common legal questions about neighbor disputes and participant objections in development

1. Can a developer start construction if an appeal has been filed against the building permit?

No. Until the decision becomes final, the developer may not start construction. The appeal has a so-called suspensive effect. ​

2. What if a neighbor raises completely unfounded objections just to get financial compensation?

The building authority is obliged to deal with every objection, but it also has the right to assess its validity. The developer can provide the building authority with counter-evidence and expert opinions that prove the objections are unfounded.

3. Can we modify the project during the construction proceedings if a neighbor raises objections?

Yes, the developer can modify the project documentation to respond to participants' objections. This often prevents an appeal or secures consent. The ARROWS law firm cooperates with designers and helps find solutions that are technically and legally acceptable to all parties. Connect with us at consultation@arws.cz.​

4. What if the building authority cancels the building permit due to participants' objections – are we entitled to compensation for damages?

If the building authority acted in accordance with the law, the developer is generally not entitled to compensation for damages from the state. Compensation for damages is only considered in the case of an unlawful decision or incorrect official procedure. However, if the developer suffered damage due to a procedural error by the authority, they may claim compensation under the Act on Liability for Damage Caused by the Exercise of Public Authority. Do not hesitate to contact our office – consultation@arws.cz.​

5. Can we sue a neighbor who is blocking our project without reason?

If a neighbor raises unfounded objections or appeals with the aim of harming the developer or extorting compensation, it could theoretically constitute an abuse of rights or even a criminal offense. In practice, however, this is difficult to prove. Mediation or negotiating an agreement is often more effective. The lawyers at ARROWS will help you find the best strategy. Write to consultation@arws.cz.

6. How long does the entire permitting process take, from the zoning decision to the final inspection?

It depends on the complexity of the project, the attitudes of the relevant authorities and participants, and the workload of the building authorities. For a standard project without complications, the process can take 12–24 months. If there are appeals or court disputes, the time can extend to 3–5 years. Experienced legal service can significantly shorten this time. If you are facing a similar problem, contact us at consultation@arws.cz.​

DO YOU HAVE MORE QUESTIONS? GET IN TOUCH

ARROWS law firm

About the author

JUDr. Jakub Dohnal, Ph.D., LL.M.
JUDr. Jakub Dohnal, Ph.D., LL.M.

Associate, managing partner

Jakub Dohnal is a solicitor and managing partner at ARROWS. He specialises in company sales, investor equity investments and property transactions — most often representing the owner who is selling a company whose value they have built up over many years and who needs the transaction to be completed on the agreed terms.

Disclaimer:

The information contained in this article is for general informational purposes only and serves as a basic guide to the issue as of 2026. Although we strive for maximum accuracy, laws and their interpretation evolve over time. We are ARROWS Law Firm, a member of the Czech Bar Association (our supervisory authority), and for the maximum security of our clients, we are insured for professional liability with a limit of CZK 350,000,000. To verify the current wording of the regulations and their application to your specific situation, it is necessary to contact ARROWS Law Firm directly (consultation@arws.cz). We are not liable for any damages arising from the independent use of the information in this article without prior individual legal consultation.