Skip to content
Law

Instalment plan and the new Civil Code

One of them is the possibility to draw up a repayment schedule even for a debt that has already expired with the effects of debt recognition. Unlike the old legislation, the new Civil Code does not require the debtor to know that the claim is time-barred. If the debtor signs the repayment schedule in the form required by law, the claim is recognised without further delay.

Book cover promoting practical legal tips related to contracts and the new Civil Code.

The new Civil Code also regulates the issue of limitation differently. Section 639 of the new Civil Code provides that if the debtor has signed a repayment schedule (acknowledgement of debt), the right is time-barred ten years after the date of signature. However, if the debtor also specifies in the acknowledgement the time by which he/she shall pay, the right shall be time-barred ten years from the last day of the specified period. Section 641 provides that if in the instalment plan (acknowledgement of debt) the performance has been divided into instalments, the ten-year limitation period also applies to the instalments and starts to run from the date of maturity of each instalment. If the debt becomes repayable due to the loss of the benefit of the instalments, the limitation period shall start to run from that moment.

Another new feature is that under Section 1953 of the new Civil Code, a creditor who has a debtor's acknowledgement of debt or other promissory note must return it to the debtor upon satisfaction or indicate on the note that it has been partially satisfied. If this is not possible, the debtor may request that the creditor issue a certificate to the effect that the debenture has lapsed to the extent that the debt has been discharged. The provisions on the receipt are not affected. In practice, this means that once the debt under the instalment plan has been discharged, you are obliged to return the instalment plan. This is, of course, at the request of the debtor. This administrative novelty must be responded to.

About the author

JUDr. Jakub Dohnal, Ph.D., LL.M.
JUDr. Jakub Dohnal, Ph.D., LL.M.

Associate, managing partner

Jakub Dohnal is a founding member of our law firm and our entire consulting group. He is primarily involved in real estate development and advising on the complex setup of commercial projects.

Disclaimer:

The information contained in this article is for general informational purposes only and serves as a basic guide to the issue as of 2014. Although we strive for maximum accuracy, laws and their interpretation evolve over time. We are ARROWS Law Firm, a member of the Czech Bar Association (our supervisory authority), and for the maximum security of our clients, we are insured for professional liability with a limit of CZK 400,000,000. To verify the current wording of the regulations and their application to your specific situation, it is necessary to contact ARROWS Law Firm directly (consultation@arws.cz). We are not liable for any damages arising from the independent use of the information in this article without prior individual legal consultation.