Skip to content

Prodej firmy s nemovitým majetkem

Standard corporate transactions primarily focus on performance, growth potential, and financial indicators such as EBITDA. The sale of real estate, on the other hand, is primarily about location, technical condition, market price, and the legal status registered in the Cadastre. Selling a company with real estate combines these two worlds and requires a comprehensive assessment that includes both financial and business analysis, as well as a detailed review of all aspects related to the property.

Na obrázku vidíte odborníka na prodej firem s nemovitým majetkem.

Key takeaways

Selling a company with real estate is challenging, but with adequate preparation, it can be very successful. Achieving an optimal result depends on several key factors:

Need legal advice?

Get in touch, we are happy to help.

ARROWS law firm

In this context, correctly assessing value, optimising tax implications, and minimising risks are key to achieving a successful and profitable deal.

This report addresses this unique issue. Its goal is to provide a detailed and exhaustive analysis that guides the reader from the initial strategic decision on the form of sale, through the pitfalls of valuation and thorough due diligence, to the secure closing of the transaction. The report highlights key differences and practical recommendations that are essential for business owners preparing for such a demanding transaction.

If you are selling a company with real estate by transferring a share, the standard rules for an LLC apply—a written agreement with notarised signatures, possible approval from the general meeting, and registration in the register. We describe in detail how the share transfer will proceed.

Strategic Decisions and Preparation for Sale

Choosing the Transaction Structure: Share Deal vs. Asset Deal

One of the first and most important strategic decisions when selling a company with real estate is choosing the transaction structure. There are primarily two options: a so-called Share Deal (sale of a business share/shares) or an Asset Deal (sale of the property itself, i.e., the real estate and other assets). The choice between them has fundamental implications for the entire course of the transaction, including legal, tax, and financial aspects.

Share Deal

In a Share Deal transaction, the seller transfers their share in the company (e.g., an LLC or a joint-stock company) that owns the real estate to the buyer. The subject of the sale is therefore not the property itself, but the entire entity—the company with all its assets, rights, and liabilities. The buyer thus acquires the business as a whole and becomes the new partner or shareholder. The real estate remains the property of the original company; only the owner changes, which is recorded in the Commercial Register. This process is called "universal succession" and is characterised by its administrative simplicity, as it is not necessary to transfer individual assets and contracts (e.g., lease relationships, supplier contracts).

Asset Deal

In contrast, an Asset Deal involves the direct sale of individual assets (e.g., land, buildings, machinery). The original company remains in the seller's possession, who temporarily "carves out" only selected assets from it. The buyer becomes the direct owner of the real estate, which is recorded in the Real Estate Cadastre. This type of transaction gives the buyer greater control and certainty, as they can choose which liabilities and assets to take over. They do not have to worry about the original company's hidden debts or legal disputes.

Key Differences and Comparison

The choice between the two structures depends on a number of factors, including the preferences of both parties, their tax situation, and their willingness to bear risks. While a Share Deal is often more tax-advantageous for the seller, an Asset Deal offers the buyer greater security.

Before you start dealing with the real estate, you need to decide on the form of the transaction. You can find a comparison of both paths, including taxes, liability for debts, and the transfer of employees, in the article share deal versus asset deal.

Aspect

Share Deal

Asset Deal

Subject of the transaction

Sale of a business share/shares.

Direct sale of real estate and other assets.

Transfer of rights and liabilities

The buyer takes over the entire company with all its assets and liabilities (including hidden ones).

The buyer takes over only specified assets and the liabilities associated with them (e.g., lease agreements).

Speed of transfer

Relatively fast process. Ownership of the share is transferred on the effective date of the agreement.

The transfer of ownership occurs only upon registration in the Real Estate Cadastre, which can take weeks or months.

Tax implications

The transfer of a share is not subject to VAT. Income from the sale may be exempt from income tax under certain conditions.

Profit from the sale is subject to income tax. It is necessary to correctly determine whether VAT applies.

Complexity

The transaction is complex in terms of due diligence, but administratively simpler.

The process is administratively demanding, especially if multiple assets and contracts are being transferred.

Risks for the buyer

High risk of hidden debts, disputes, or legal defects that must be thoroughly investigated.

The risk is significantly lower because the buyer takes over only clearly defined assets.

ARROWS law firm

Impact of the Abolition of the Real Estate Acquisition Tax

One of the key factors that has recently influenced the choice between a Share and an Asset Deal is the abolition of the 4% real estate acquisition tax. This tax, which was abolished in 2020 with retroactive effect from December 2019, previously burdened the buyer in an Asset Deal. The result was a situation where buyers often insisted on a Share Deal to avoid this financial burden.

However, the abolition of the real estate acquisition tax removed this tax disadvantage of the Asset Deal, making this form of transaction significantly more attractive for the buyer. This legislative step has led to the Asset Deal now being preferred in many cases, as it allows the buyer to gain control over the property without having to take on all the liabilities and hidden risks that come with buying an entire company. This has strengthened the position of the Asset Deal as an equal and often preferred alternative, giving the seller more negotiating power and a better chance of finding buyers who prefer a lower level of risk.

For real estate companies, the decision of whether to sell a share in the company or the property itself has the greatest impact. A comparison of both options, including the practical effects on lease relationships, can be found in the text about how a share deal versus asset deal works.

DO YOU NEED LEGAL HELP?

Get in touch — we're happy to help.

ARROWS law firm

Valuing a Company with Real Estate: How to Avoid the Most Common Mistakes

Correct valuation is key to a successful sale, but for a company with real estate, it often becomes a source of misunderstanding and transaction failure. Business owners tend to value their assets using a sum-of-the-parts method, where they add the book value of the building, land, and machinery to the value of the business. However, this approach leads to a significant value gap between the seller's expectations and the buyer's offer.

The Investor's Perspective: The Income Approach

Investors and buyers view a company with real estate primarily from the perspective of its income, not its assets. They use the income approach, which values the business's ability to generate profit (the "going concern" principle). The basis is the EBITDA indicator (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortisation), which is multiplied by an industry-specific coefficient (multiplier), typically ranging between 3 and 7. In this approach, the value of the real estate is not an additional item to be added to the price. It is perceived as a key asset (along with machinery, employees, and equipment) that helps generate EBITDA.

From this perspective, a building, just like a production line, is merely a means of making money. The investor calculates how quickly their investment will be returned and makes a corresponding purchase price offer. If the real estate were the largest asset but the company was loss-making, its value would only equal the market price of the real estate, not the value of the business.

This different perspective is the main reason why sales of companies with real estate often stall at the very beginning. The seller sees high value in the property and expects this value to be fully reflected in the purchase price. The buyer, however, assesses what the company is capable of earning and how much their investment will return in future profits.

Strategic Recommendations for Owners

To avoid this "value gap," owners should consider several options. One is to transfer the real estate out of the company's assets into personal ownership or a separate company before the sale. In such a case, the seller sells the business as such for its income-based value and simultaneously sells the real estate separately for its market price. This allows them to get paid for both and achieve a better selling price.

Preparation for Sale: Optimisation and Clean-up (Pre-Due Diligence)

Thorough preparation for a sale is critical. Experts often call it "pre-due diligence" because it is an internal review aimed at identifying and eliminating weaknesses before the buyer's due diligence begins. It's not just about gathering documents, but about actively "cleaning up" the company, which can significantly increase its value and facilitate the entire sales process.

A key aspect is to get rid of "tax optimisation" practices and ensure that financial statements are accurate and transparent. Investors only value official data, and anything earned "on the side" will not be included in the company's value. Any discrepancies can lead to doubts and a reduction in the offered price by the buyer.

A proactive approach to preparation changes the dynamic of the deal from defensive to offensive. When the seller identifies and resolves weaknesses themselves (e.g., legalises unauthorised constructions, repairs obvious technical defects in the property, ensures clear contracts with suppliers), they take away the buyer's arguments for a price reduction and build trust. The owner should be aware that any defect discovered during due diligence undermines trust and can slow down or even stop the transaction. Careful preparation with the help of external advisors is therefore the best investment for achieving a higher sale price and a smooth transaction.

Our specialists will help you

JUDr. Jakub Dohnal, Ph.D., LL.M.

JUDr. Jakub Dohnal, Ph.D., LL.M.

advokát, řídící partner

dohnal@arws.cz
JUDr. Ondřej Stehlík, LL.M., MBA

JUDr. Ondřej Stehlík, LL.M., MBA

advokát, partner

stehlik@arws.cz
ARROWS law firm

Phases of the Transaction Step by Step

The Right Advisory Team is the Foundation of Success

Selling a company, especially one with real estate, is such a complex matter that it cannot be done without a team of experts. One of the most common mistakes sellers make is relying on a single advisor, typically a real estate agent, who often lacks the necessary competence for a complex M&A transaction.

The Role of a Real Estate Agent vs. an M&A Advisor

While a real estate agent is an expert on the property market and can excellently prepare and present a site for sale, their expertise often ends at the boundaries of the company itself. Selling a company (a Share Deal) requires deep knowledge of commercial law, accounting, tax regulations, and the entire M&A process. A real estate agent is a transaction facilitator who has an interest in its closing, whereas a lawyer defends the interests of their client. In a Share Deal transaction, where all liabilities are assumed, the involvement of M&A specialists and lawyers from the very beginning is crucial.

Key Specialists in the Sales Team

  1. M&A Advisor: Coordinates the entire sales process. Helps with preparing the company, approaching potential buyers, negotiating, and managing the entire timeline.

  2. Lawyer: Ensures the legal correctness of contracts, oversees due diligence, and minimises legal risks. Selling a company with real estate requires a lawyer specialised in commercial transactions and real estate law.

  3. Tax Advisor: Assesses the tax implications of both transaction options, proposes the most tax-efficient structure, and assists with tax due diligence.

Due Diligence: The Heart of the Transaction and Key to Success

Due Diligence (DD) is an in-depth review conducted by the buyer and their team of advisors to verify the condition of the company being acquired and to identify all related risks. It is the most important phase of the transaction, which reveals potential deal-breakers or reasons for adjusting the purchase price.

Types of Due Diligence in Real Estate Transactions

  1. Legal due diligence: This reviews the status of ownership titles, the absence of liens, easements, court disputes, enforcement proceedings, and other legal defects.

  2. Financial and tax due diligence: This analyses financial statements, tax returns, and liabilities (e.g., real estate tax, VAT).

  3. Technical and environmental due diligence: This assesses the technical condition of the property and any potential environmental contamination of the land. This can lead to hidden costs for the buyer, for example, for remediation.

DO YOU NEED LEGAL HELP?

Get in touch — we're happy to help.

ARROWS law firm

The Risk of "Unauthorised Construction" as a Potential "Deal-Breaker"

A specific risk for the Czech environment is the existence of so-called "unauthorised constructions," i.e., buildings that physically exist but are not legally registered in the Real Estate Cadastre or were built without a building permit. From a legal perspective, the physical existence of such a building is worthless to an investor because it cannot be disposed of or used as collateral for a bank loan.

The consequences are serious: the building authority can order its removal and impose high fines, which can run into millions of crowns. Moreover, with the new Building Act, the subsequent legalisation of these constructions is very uncertain, as it requires compliance with the zoning plan, which is often not met.

Areas of Due Diligence and Specific Risks

Area of Due Diligence

What is reviewed

Specific risks and their impacts

Legal

Ownership titles, liens, easements, lease agreements.

Insufficient ownership rights, restrictions on use (easements), ownership disputes.

Real Estate

Registration in the Cadastre, building permits, occupancy permits.

Risk of "unauthorised construction" (a physical building without legal existence), potential threat of demolition and high fines.

Financial

Financial statements, cash flow, EBITDA.

Overvaluation of the company, hidden debts, unjustified adjustments to financial indicators.

Tax

Tax returns, VAT, real estate tax.

Risk of additional tax assessment, incorrect tax procedures, unexpected tax liabilities.

Technical

Technical condition of buildings, infrastructure.

Hidden defects (e.g., in the structure), need for expensive repairs or remediation.

Environmental

Environmental contamination of land, waste management.

High costs for remediation of contaminated land, fines for non-compliance with environmental standards.

ARROWS law firm

Contractual Security and Financial Escrow

After a successful due diligence, the phase of negotiating contractual terms and preparing documents follows. The purchase agreement (whether a Share Purchase Agreement or an Asset Purchase Agreement) is a complex document that must cover all aspects of the transaction in detail, including the seller's representations and warranties about the state of the company and the property.

To ensure the secure transfer of funds, it is essential to use an independent financial escrow. Attorney, notary, or bank escrow is commonly used for this purpose. The funds are released to the seller only when all contractual conditions are met, such as the successful registration of ownership rights in the Real Estate Cadastre. This protects the buyer from losing money if the transaction does not go through, and at the same time gives the seller certainty that the buyer is able and willing to pay.

Closing the Transaction and Maximising Value

Legal and Administrative Completion

The final phase of the transaction is its closing. In an Asset Deal, the key is the transfer of ownership in the Real Estate Cadastre, which takes place only after the application for registration is filed and approved. This can take several weeks, so the contract must address the transitional period, i.e., who bears the operating costs and who collects any income. In a Share Deal, the ownership of the share is transferred at the moment the contract becomes effective, which is significantly faster, but it is necessary to ensure the change is registered in the Commercial Register.

As part of the handover, it is also necessary to formally transfer all contracts with utility suppliers (electricity, gas, water) and hand over all key documentation, including building and technical plans, permits, and contractual agreements.

  • Realistic Expectations: Owners should realise that investors value a company primarily based on its profitability, not by summing the value of the property and the business. A realistic assessment of value is essential for finding a suitable buyer.

  • Proactive Preparation (Pre-Due Diligence): A timely "clean-up" of the company and a review of all risks before the sale will remove future obstacles and strengthen the seller's negotiating position. This includes legally addressing unregistered buildings, optimising financial statements, and reviewing key contracts.

  • Assembling the Right Team: Relying on a single real estate agent is insufficient. The transaction requires a team of specialists—an M&A advisor, a lawyer, and a tax advisor—who complement each other and ensure a smooth process.

  • Patience and Precision: The entire process is long and demanding, but careful and precise work at every step will pay off many times over in the form of a higher sale price and minimisation of future complications.

Overview of Key Points for a Successful Sale

Selling a company that includes real estate is not a routine transaction, but a strategic operation that requires a comprehensive and proactive approach. The analysis shows that the key to success lies in a precise understanding of three main pillars.

The first is the strategic decision on the transaction structure, i.e., the choice between an Asset Deal and a Share Deal. A comparison of the two options reveals that the abolition of the real estate acquisition tax has significantly changed market dynamics and made the Asset Deal much more attractive for the buyer. This factor provides the seller with greater flexibility and should therefore always be taken into account.

The second pillar is a realistic valuation of the business. A common mistake, where owners try to add the value of the real estate to the value of the business, leads to unsuccessful negotiations. For the buyer, the key is the income approach, which perceives the real estate as part of the whole that generates profit. To maximise value, owners should consider separating the real estate from the company before starting the sale.

The third and most important pillar is comprehensive preparation and a professional team. Identifying and eliminating weaknesses, such as legal defects, unregistered buildings in the cadastre, or accounting discrepancies, before due diligence is the most effective way to achieve a higher purchase price and minimise risks. The sales process then requires a team of experienced advisors—an M&A specialist, a lawyer, and a tax advisor—who will ensure that the transaction proceeds smoothly, securely, and with maximum benefit for the seller.Regular and systematic work in these areas transforms a complex sale from a random process into a managed and successful operation. With sufficient preparation and the right advisory team, it is possible to achieve exceptional results even in such a complex situation.

We summarise the broader context of the transaction market and what is changing in the rules in our overview article on acquisitions and company sales in 2026.

DO YOU NEED LEGAL HELP?

Get in touch — we're happy to help.

ARROWS law firm

About the author

JUDr. Jakub Dohnal, Ph.D., LL.M.
JUDr. Jakub Dohnal, Ph.D., LL.M.

Associate, managing partner

Jakub Dohnal is a solicitor and managing partner at ARROWS. He specialises in company sales, investor equity investments and property transactions — most often representing the owner who is selling a company whose value they have built up over many years and who needs the transaction to be completed on the agreed terms.

Disclaimer:

The information contained in this article is for general informational purposes only and serves as a basic guide to the issue as of 2026. Although we strive for maximum accuracy, laws and their interpretation evolve over time. We are ARROWS Law Firm, a member of the Czech Bar Association (our supervisory authority), and for the maximum security of our clients, we are insured for professional liability with a limit of CZK 350,000,000. To verify the current wording of the regulations and their application to your specific situation, it is necessary to contact ARROWS Law Firm directly (consultation@arws.cz). We are not liable for any damages arising from the independent use of the information in this article without prior individual legal consultation.