Skip to content

Successful defense of a client against an employer's claim under a qualification agreement

The law firm represented a client in a dispute with an employer over compensation for breach of a qualification agreement. The employer demanded CZK 103,166 plus interest, arguing that the client had terminated his employment before the end of the term specified in the qualification agreement. Our defense convinced the court that the employer's claim was unfounded and that our client had acted lawfully. The lawsuit was dismissed in its entirety and the judgment became final, as the plaintiff did not appeal.

Lawyer standing confidently after defending a client in a qualification agreement case.

Legal representation was led by Vojtěch Sucharda, attorney and partner, who specializes in international law and also serves as head of ARROWS International. In his practice, he also focuses on litigation and the regulation of highly specialized industries, which enables him to effectively represent clients even in complex labor disputes.

The outcome of the dispute is proof of our colleague's excellent work and expertise, which led to a clearly successful result for our client.

About the author

Mgr. Vojtěch Sucharda
Mgr. Vojtěch Sucharda

Associate, partner

Managing Partner ARROWS International | Head of Legal Practice Group ETL Global

Disclaimer:

The information contained in this article is for general informational purposes only and serves as a basic guide to the issue as of 2025. Although we strive for maximum accuracy, laws and their interpretation evolve over time. We are ARROWS Law Firm, a member of the Czech Bar Association (our supervisory authority), and for the maximum security of our clients, we are insured for professional liability with a limit of CZK 400,000,000. To verify the current wording of the regulations and their application to your specific situation, it is necessary to contact ARROWS Law Firm directly (consultation@arws.cz). We are not liable for any damages arising from the independent use of the information in this article without prior individual legal consultation.