Skip to content

Premiums, Bonuses and KPIs

How to set it up to withstand scrutiny

Mgr. Jan Pavlík
Published:Updated:

Bonuses, incentives and KPIs should be structured so it is clear when an employee has an enforceable right to payment and when the employer retains discretion. Overly precise criteria, a manager’s decision or automatic repeated payments can turn a discretionary bonus into a binding entitlement. This article explains how to structure bonus rules, which KPIs create risk and how to prepare the system for inspection.

A professional discusses structuring employee bonuses and KPIs under Czech law.

Key takeaways

A discretionary bonus does not become an entitlement automatically, even if targets are met; it may become an entitlement primarily through overly specific criteria, its award by a manager, or long-standing practice.
Internal salary or bonus regulations must clearly distinguish between entitlement-based and discretionary components of remuneration. For discretionary bonuses, it is crucial to explicitly state that there is no legal entitlement to their award.
During inspections, the SÚIP (State Labour Inspection Office) also focuses on equal pay and discriminatory bonus schemes. Risks include, for example, reducing a bonus due to statutory obstacles to work or prohibiting employees from discussing their salaries.
Bonus KPIs must be set to withstand scrutiny not only from the SÚIP but also from the Financial Authority. Vague criteria can lead to the tax deductibility of the bonus being challenged, especially for management and executive directors.
ARROWS law firm

When Does "Goodwill" Become a Legal Entitlement? The Trap of Guaranteed vs. Non-Guaranteed Wages

The first is the non-guaranteed wage component. As the name suggests, an employee does not have an automatic legal entitlement to its payment, even after meeting targets. Granting it depends entirely on the employer's final discretion. This typically includes annual bonuses or extraordinary rewards where you want to maintain flexibility.

The second is the guaranteed wage component. Once an employee meets predefined and precise conditions (e.g., a clear mathematical formula in a bonus policy), the employer has a statutory obligation to pay this component. The employee can successfully claim it in court.

How a Non-Guaranteed Bonus Becomes Guaranteed (Even Against Your Will)

This is where companies most often make mistakes. There are three main traps that can turn your "voluntary" bonus into an enforceable debt:

1. Overly precise criteria: If your internal regulation defines a bonus as a purely mathematical calculation (e.g., "meeting KPIs at 100% = a bonus of CZK 20,000") and does not include a clause about the employer's final constitutive decision, a court will classify it as a guaranteed component.

2. A manager's decision: Even a fully non-guaranteed bonus becomes guaranteed the moment a supervisor demonstrably informs the employee that the bonus has been granted. From that point on, it is a binding commitment.

3. Repeated payments (established practice): If you pay a bonus "automatically" every year in the same amount without a clear link to performance, it can be argued that it has become an established practice and a tacit part of the salary.

The foundation of your protection is precise wording. Your Internal Wage Regulation or Bonus Policy must clearly specify which components are guaranteed and which are non-guaranteed, and for the non-guaranteed ones, it must be explicitly stated that there is no legal entitlement to them.

Our Prague-based lawyers at ARROWS prepare wage regulations and employment contracts daily. We will ensure your bonuses remain genuinely non-guaranteed, allowing you to maintain flexibility. Need your documents reviewed? Write to us at consultation@arws.cz.

What Exactly Will the SÚIP Focus on During an Inspection of Your Remuneration System?

The State Labour Inspection Office (SÚIP) has made remuneration one of its main inspection priorities for 2025. Inspectors are no longer just looking for errors on payslips or missing guaranteed wages.

Inspections are specifically focused on equal pay for men and women and any form of hidden discrimination in bonus systems. In 2024, fines for "common" errors in employment relationships, which include remuneration, exceeded CZK 45 million.

Red Flag #1: The "Attendance Bonus"

This is a popular but extremely risky "Czech phenomenon" that the SÚIP actively seeks out and fines. Companies try to use it to address high absenteeism, but it is almost legally indefensible.

The problem? Such a bonus is almost always assessed as indirect discrimination. It penalises employees for exercising their statutory rights: being on temporary sick leave, caring for a family member (OČR), or attending a doctor's appointment based on a statutory obstacle to work. If your bonus system reduces a premium for any "absence," including statutory obstacles to work, you are exposing yourself to an almost certain fine.

DO YOU NEED LEGAL HELP?

Get in touch — we're happy to help.

ARROWS law firm

Red Flag #2: Salary Confidentiality Clauses

The practice of employers prohibiting employees from discussing their salary amounts was common until recently. Today, however, it is explicitly forbidden. The reason is that these clauses prevent the detection of unequal pay and create a non-transparent environment.

Inspectors will look for these clauses not only in employment contracts but also in internal regulations or codes of conduct. Our Prague-based lawyers at ARROWS will conduct a comprehensive audit of your HR documentation and eliminate these hidden risks. For an immediate solution to your situation, write to us at consultation@arws.cz.

SÚIP Inspections and Employment Law Disputes

The following table summarises the most common risks our clients face in the area of remuneration and how ARROWS helps prevent them.

Risks and Sanctions

How ARROWS Helps

Discriminatory bonus system (e.g., attendance bonus, different rewards for men/women). Risk of a fine up to CZK 2,000,000 and the need to pay the differences.

Legal audit of remuneration. We identify and remove all discriminatory elements from your regulations. Need a legal audit? Write to consultation@arws.cz.

Invalid salary confidentiality clause. Risk of a fine from the SÚIP and reputational damage.

Review of employment contracts and policies. We ensure your documentation complies with the latest legislation. To review your contracts, contact us at consultation@arws.cz.

Missing or vague internal wage regulation. Risk that all bonuses will be considered guaranteed and an inability to defend yourself during an inspection.

Turnkey preparation of wage and bonus policies. We will create a system for you that is motivating for people and safe for you. Want to prepare a wage regulation? Write to consultation@arws.cz.

Court dispute with an employee over the payment of a bonus you consider non-guaranteed.

Representation in court. We have extensive experience representing companies in employment law disputes. Facing a dispute? Connect with us at consultation@arws.cz.

ARROWS law firm

FAQ – Legal Tips for Setting Up Bonuses

1. Can we take away an employee's premium if they are often sick?

If the 'premium' is defined as a guaranteed wage component linked to time worked or actual performance, then it is logically reduced for the period of illness. However, if it is a 'punishment' for the illness itself (as with an attendance bonus), it constitutes discrimination. We recommend setting criteria based on positive performance, not on 'punishing' absence. If you are dealing with a similar issue, contact us at consultation@arws.cz.

2. Is an employee who resigned in November entitled to an annual bonus?

Case law is key here. If the bonus is a reward for past performance (for the year they worked), they are likely entitled to it. However, if you have cleverly included a condition in the bonus policy that the employment relationship must be active on the payment date (e.g., March 31 of the following year) and the bonus also has a motivational (future) character, courts tend to rule that no entitlement has arisen. For the correct wording of these conditions, write to us at consultation@arws.cz.

3. What if our KPIs are set subjectively, 'based on the manager's satisfaction'?

This is very risky. Firstly, the SÚIP may deem it non-transparent and potentially discriminatory. Secondly, such an expense is difficult to justify to the tax authority. KPIs should be as objective, measurable, and specific as possible. We can help you define KPIs in a legally secure way – contact us at consultation@arws.cz.
ARROWS law firm

KPIs That Stand Up to Scrutiny: How to Face a Tax Audit and Motivate Management

The problem isn't just the SÚIP. Once you have a remuneration system that is too vague, the tax authority will sooner or later come knocking. While the SÚIP inspects labour law aspects (compliance with the Czech Labour Code, § 110), the tax authority inspects tax aspects.

The Tax Authority's main question is: "Is this bonus a tax-deductible expense?" To be so, it must be clearly linked to the achievement of taxable income.

Which KPIs Are Risky for the Tax Authority?

The biggest risk comes from subjective and unmeasurable criteria. Bonuses paid based on "satisfaction," "good work," or "contribution to the team" can easily be challenged by the tax administrator as expenses not related to generating profit, leading to an additional tax assessment.

A special chapter concerns bonuses for management and executives. Here, there is a high risk that if the bonus is not properly supported by a contract and linked to specific performance, it could be reclassified as a disguised distribution of profits. This would mean not only an additional assessment of income tax but also social security and health insurance contributions.

Your remuneration system must win two battles: be fair for the SÚIP and tax-deductible for the Tax Authority. This pressure often works in opposite directions: if a bonus is too discretionary, the Tax Authority will challenge it. If it is too clearly defined, it becomes a guaranteed wage component.

The lawyers and tax advisors at ARROWS have experience defending bonus systems for dozens of clients, including over 150 joint-stock companies. We will prepare expert training for your management and HR on how to correctly set and evaluate KPIs. We provide comprehensive legal opinions that will defend your remuneration system during a tax audit. Need tax and legal certainty? Write to consultation@arws.cz.

International Companies in the Czech Republic: The Trap of Adopting Global Bonus Policies

If you are the Czech branch of a multinational corporation, you face a specific risk: pressure to implement a global bonus policy that clashes with the reality of Czech law. Why can't a global "Bonus Policy" just be translated and used?

A global HR policy (often from the US or UK) is written in a different legal environment. The Czech Labour Code is much stricter and provides greater employee protection. Principles like "equal pay for equal work" (§ 110) or protection against discrimination (§ 16) always take precedence over any internal directive from your parent company (HQ).

DO YOU NEED LEGAL HELP?

Get in touch — we're happy to help.

ARROWS law firm

A typical risk is that global policies do not distinguish between guaranteed and non-guaranteed wage components in the way Czech law does. Relying on a global policy in a Czech court is a recipe for failure. Similarly, special rules apply to the remuneration of posted workers, which must comply with Czech legislation.

Thanks to our decade of practice and the ARROWS International network, we handle employment law matters with an international element daily. Our lawyers know how to "translate" the requirements of your parent company (HQ) into the Czech legal framework. We will ensure that your local contracts are aligned with the global strategy while protecting the Czech branch from sanctions. For assistance with international cases, write to us at consultation@arws.cz.

Tax Audits and Court Disputes

The following table shows the risks associated with tax and court disputes, which are often more costly than the fine from the SÚIP itself.

Risks and Sanctions

How ARROWS Helps

Additional tax and insurance assessment on bonuses. The tax administrator challenges the deductibility of the expense because the KPIs were vague or not linked to income.

Legal opinions and tax optimisation. We will prepare arguments and documents that prove the connection between bonuses and your taxable income. Want a tax opinion? Write to consultation@arws.cz.

Reclassification of an executive's bonus as a disguised distribution of profits. Risk of high additional tax and insurance assessments.

Review and preparation of executive service agreements. We will structure management remuneration to be tax-defensible and separate from profits. Dealing with management remuneration? Contact us at consultation@arws.cz.

Court dispute over the invalidity of a bonus reduction. An employee sues, claiming your "subjective" assessment was just a pretext for non-payment.

Preparation of litigation strategy and representation. We will help you set criteria that are objective and defensible in court. Need representation? Write to consultation@arws.cz.

Mass claims from former employees for bonuses after their departure.

Audit and setting of payment conditions. We will ensure your bonus policies clearly define entitlement upon termination of employment. For dispute prevention, write to consultation@arws.cz.

ARROWS law firm

Conclusion: ARROWS as Your Partner for Safe and Effective Remuneration

A correctly designed system of premiums, bonuses, and KPIs is not an expense but an investment. A poorly designed system is a ticking time bomb, waiting for an SÚIP inspection or the first dissatisfied employee.

The foundation of your protection is a meticulously drafted Internal Wage Regulation and Bonus Policy. These documents must be living, understandable, and legally watertight.

ARROWS provides you with comprehensive legal services – from preparing documentation that protects you from fines to expert training for your management and representation in courts and before administrative authorities. Our experience with over 150 joint-stock companies and 250 limited liability companies allows us to see risks that others overlook. At the same time, we are happy to listen to your business ideas. We often connect our clients when we see a mutual business opportunity.

Want to be sure that your remuneration system is 100% compliant and genuinely motivating? Connect with us at consultation@arws.cz and get a tailored legal solution.

FAQ – Most Common Legal Questions about Premiums and KPIs

1. What is the exact difference between a wage regulation and a bonus policy?

An Internal Wage Regulation is a comprehensive document that establishes the overall remuneration system (forms of wages, payment dates, etc.). A Bonus Policy is often an appendix to it or a separate document that goes into greater detail on specific premiums – defining their purpose, indicators (KPIs), calculation basis, period, and conditions for reduction or withdrawal. To prepare both documents, contact us at consultation@arws.cz.

2. Can we make the payment of an annual bonus conditional on the employee working for us for another year?

No, that would be invalid. However, you can (as confirmed by the Supreme Court) set a condition that entitlement to the bonus only arises for employees who are still employed on a specific future date (e.g., the payment date). The key is that the bonus is not just a reward for the past but also a motivation for the future. We can help you formulate this correctly; write to consultation@arws.cz.

3. What is the penalty for not having a written remuneration system?

A significant one. Not only do you expose yourself to a fine from the SÚIP for the absence of mandatory documentation, but more importantly, you have no way to defend yourself. Employees can claim they were promised anything. A written wage regulation is your primary defense document.9 Do not hesitate to contact our firm – consultation@arws.cz – and we will prepare one for you.

4. Must bonuses also be paid to employees on DPP or DPČ contracts?

The Czech Labour Code requires equal pay for equal work (§ 110). If a worker on an agreement to complete a job (DPP) or an agreement to perform work (DPČ) performs the same work as an employee on a standard employment contract, they should be entitled to the same basic remuneration. The situation with bonuses is more complex. If a bonus is tied to performance that the contract worker could have met, excluding them could be discriminatory. We would be happy to provide a legal assessment at consultation@arws.cz.

5. What should we do if an SÚIP inspection is already underway at our company?

Stay calm, but act quickly. Cooperate fully with the inspectors (non-cooperation can result in a fine of up to CZK 500,000), but do not provide information or documents that are not the subject of the inspection. Contact a legal representative immediately. We provide immediate legal assistance during SÚIP inspections. Contact us at consultation@arws.cz.

6. Can an employee sue on the grounds that their KPIs were unfair?

Yes. If KPIs are set unrealistically, subjectively, or in a way that discriminates against a certain group, the employee can take legal action. The employer must be able to prove that the KPIs are objective, fair, and linked to the nature of the work. We will review your KPIs to make them legally watertight. Write to consultation@arws.cz.

DO YOU HAVE MORE QUESTIONS? GET IN TOUCH

ARROWS law firm

Don't want to solve this problem on your own? Over 2,000 clients trust the ARROWS law firm, and we are honored as the Law Firm of the Year 2024. See our references HERE and it will be our honor to help you solve your problem. The initial inquiry is free of charge.

About the author

Mgr. Jan Pavlík
Mgr. Jan Pavlík

Associate

Jan Pavlík is an experienced attorney who focuses on resolving complex situations in corporate life. At Arrows Law Firm, he primarily deals with corporate law, labor law, commercial disputes, and contractual matters.

Disclaimer:

The information contained in this article is for general informational purposes only and serves as a basic guide to the issue as of 2026. Although we strive for maximum accuracy, laws and their interpretation evolve over time. We are ARROWS Law Firm, a member of the Czech Bar Association (our supervisory authority), and for the maximum security of our clients, we are insured for professional liability with a limit of CZK 350,000,000. To verify the current wording of the regulations and their application to your specific situation, it is necessary to contact ARROWS Law Firm directly (consultation@arws.cz). We are not liable for any damages arising from the independent use of the information in this article without prior individual legal consultation.