Jak řešit vymáhání pohledávky v Německu

Key takeaways
The Challenge: An Unpaid Invoice from Germany and a Ticking Clock
In this situation, a key legal concept comes into play: the statute of limitations (Verjährung). German law is relentless in this regard. The general limitation period for commercial claims is three years, according to the German Civil Code (§ 195 BGB).
However, it is crucial to know when this period begins to run. It is not from the due date of the invoice, but at the end of the calendar year in which the claim arose and you, as the creditor, became aware of the circumstances giving rise to the claim and the identity of the debtor.
This seemingly minor detail has enormous strategic implications. It's not just about filing a lawsuit in time. The approaching end of the limitation period can be used as powerful leverage in negotiations. Timely and qualified intervention by the lawyers at ARROWS, who meticulously monitor limitation periods, can stop the clock and send a clear signal to the debtor that their speculation on your inaction is over.
First Step: A Strategic Out-of-Court Demand (Mahnung)
Before embarking on costly court proceedings, it is always more effective to attempt an out-of-court settlement (außergerichtliches Inkasso). It is faster, significantly cheaper, and offers a chance to preserve business relationships. The foundation is sending a qualified reminder, known in German as a Mahnung. However, this is not just a matter of resending the invoice with a red stamp.
For a Mahnung to be effective, it must contain clear essentials: an unambiguous demand for payment of the amount due, precise identification of both you and your debtor, a reference to the original invoice and its number, and, of course, the amount owed. In practice, up to three reminders are often sent, with the tone escalating, although German law only requires one for a default to occur.
However, the crucial difference is the psychological and legal distinction between a reminder from your accounting department and an official pre-action letter from a law firm specialising in German law. A German debtor is often well aware that a Czech company or a Czech lawyer without direct ties to Germany can do little against them.
A letter from ARROWS, referencing our international network ARROWS International and our detailed knowledge of German procedures, is a clear signal to the debtor that their assets are under real threat.
ARROWS prepares and sends these qualified pre-action letters for clients, which have a much higher success rate. Experience shows that a large proportion of debtors pay upon receiving such a letter to avoid a court dispute. The cost of this action is a fraction of what a full court process would entail.
Proactive Defence: How to Prepare Bulletproof Contracts for the German Market
The best dispute is one that never starts. At ARROWS, we therefore place enormous emphasis not only on reactive problem-solving but, above all, on strategic prevention. A correctly drafted contract is the cornerstone of protecting your investments and future receivables in the German market.
Retention of Title (Eigentumsvorbehalt)
One of the most powerful tools offered by German law (§ 449 BGB) is the retention of title. This instrument ensures that the delivered goods remain your property until the purchase price is paid in full. In business practice, its more sophisticated forms are used:
Extended retention of title (verlängerter Eigentumsvorbehalt): This clause is crucial for B2B relationships. It secures you even if your customer further processes or sells the goods. The agreement typically includes a pre-agreed assignment of future claims that your debtor will acquire from selling these goods to their customers.
Expanded retention of title (erweiterter Eigentumsvorbehalt): In this case, ownership transfers to the buyer only when they have paid all existing debts from your mutual business relationship, not just the price for the specific delivery of goods.
Choice of Law and Jurisdiction (Rechtswahl und Gerichtsstand)
Czech companies often make a strategic mistake by insisting on the application of Czech law and the jurisdiction of Czech courts in contracts with German partners. At first glance, this may seem like a safer option, but the opposite is true.
If you have to sue a German debtor in a German court (which is often unavoidable for effective enforcement), that court will have to ascertain the content of Czech law in a complex and costly manner, for example, through expert opinions. This will significantly prolong and increase the cost of the entire proceedings.
The most effective and, in terms of cost and time, the best option is to agree on German law and the jurisdiction of a German court in the contract. This step will ensure the fastest path to an enforceable decision and subsequent enforcement against the debtor's assets in Germany.
At ARROWS, we will prepare or review your commercial contracts to include correctly formulated clauses on retention of title, choice of law, and jurisdiction, thus protecting your business from future problems.
When Demands Are Not Enough: Court Proceedings in Germany
If the out-of-court phase fails, it is time to turn to the courts. For commercial disputes in Germany, two types of first-instance courts are relevant, with jurisdiction determined by the value of the dispute (Streitwert):
District Court (Amtsgericht): Competent for disputes with a value not exceeding EUR 5,000.
Regional Court (Landgericht): Handles disputes with a value over EUR 5,000. At this court, representation by a lawyer is mandatory.
It is important to mention that a legislative process is underway in Germany aimed at increasing the threshold for the jurisdiction of district courts to EUR 8,000, or possibly even EUR 10,000.
By monitoring these current developments at ARROWS, we can provide our clients with strategic advice with a view to the future, thereby optimising the costs of any potential dispute.
The Express Route for Undisputed Claims: The Mahnverfahren Procedure
For undisputed monetary claims, German law offers a highly effective and swift tool – the judicial dunning procedure (gerichtliches Mahnverfahren). This is not a classic court case with evidence, but an accelerated, predominantly administrative process. Its strength lies in its speed and low costs.
The procedure is as follows:
1. Application for an Order for Payment (Antrag auf Erlass eines Mahnbescheids): We file a standardised application on your behalf, often electronically. At this stage, the court does not examine whether your claim is justified, but only the formal correctness of the application.
2. Issuance of the Order for Payment (Mahnbescheid): If the application is in order, the court issues an order for payment and serves it on the debtor. The debtor then has a two-week period from service to respond.
3. Debtor's Response: The debtor can either pay, which resolves the matter, or file an objection (Widerspruch). Filing an objection automatically transforms the procedure into a classic contentious court process. If the debtor does nothing, it opens the way for you to take the next step.
4. Application for an Enforcement Order (Antrag auf Erlass eines Vollstreckungsbescheids): If the debtor has not responded within the time limit, we file an application for an enforcement order.
5. Enforcement Order (Vollstreckungsbescheid): This decision is a final and fully enforceable title. It is valid for 30 years and is a direct ticket to initiating enforcement against the debtor's assets.
The lawyers at ARROWS will handle the entire Mahnverfahren process for you, from the initial strategic consultation on whether this procedure is suitable for your case, to obtaining the final enforcement order.
Harnessing the Power of the EU: The European Payment Order
For cross-border claims within the European Union (with the exception of Denmark), there is another powerful tool: the European Payment Order (EPO). Its main advantage is that the resulting title is automatically recognised and enforceable in all member states without the need for a further lengthy recognition procedure (the so-called exequatur).
The process is similar to the German Mahnverfahren, but differs in the details. The application is submitted on a standard European form, and the debtor has a longer period to file an objection – 30 days. Thanks to our international network, ARROWS International, we handle cases with a European element on a daily basis and know how to choose and effectively use the most appropriate tool for our clients.
For the recovery of undisputed monetary claims against debtors in Germany, both the German Mahnverfahren and the European Payment Order can be used. Both tools aim to quickly obtain an enforceable title, but they differ mainly in their scope of application, procedural rules, and subsequent enforcement.
The German Mahnverfahren is primarily intended for the recovery of undisputed monetary claims within Germany, although it can be used for foreign debtors under certain conditions. It is a formalised and generally fast procedure, which is particularly suitable if the creditor expects that the debtor will not actively dispute the claim. The debtor generally has two weeks to file an objection to the issued order for payment.
If no objection is filed, the creditor can then obtain a Vollstreckungsbescheid, a title that allows for the initiation of enforcement proceedings under German rules. Court fees are governed by German law and their amount depends mainly on the value of the claim being pursued.
The European Payment Order, on the other hand, is intended exclusively for cross-border disputes within the European Union, where the creditor and debtor are domiciled or have their registered office in different member states. Here too, it must be a monetary claim that the creditor assumes will not be disputed. The debtor has 30 days from the service of the European Payment Order to file an objection.
The advantage of the European Payment Order is its cross-border applicability. If the debtor does not file an objection against it, it becomes directly enforceable in other EU member states, with the exception of Denmark, without the need for a separate recognition procedure. The enforcement itself is then governed by the law of the state in which enforcement is to be carried out.
From a practical point of view, the Mahnverfahren is particularly suitable when the debtor is in Germany and the goal is to quickly obtain a title enforceable under German law. The European Payment Order, on the other hand, is more suitable for cross-border claims, especially if it may be necessary to subsequently carry out enforcement in another European Union member state. The choice of a specific procedure should therefore always be based not only on the amount and nature of the claim, but also on the location of the debtor and their assets.
Risk Management: What to Watch Out For and How ARROWS Can Help
Every business case carries risks. The key to success is being able to identify and manage them effectively. The following table summarises the most common threats when recovering debts in Germany and shows how ARROWS can help you eliminate them.
Potential Problems | How ARROWS Helps (consultation@arws.cz) |
Claim becomes statute-barred (Verjährung) → Permanent loss of the right to the money; the claim becomes legally unenforceable. | We initiate court proceedings (Mahnverfahren), which interrupts the running of the limitation period and protects your claim. |
Debtor files an objection (Widerspruch) → The expedited procedure turns into a costly and lengthy court dispute (Klageverfahren). | We represent clients in German courts, preparing the statement of claim and all arguments for success in contentious proceedings. |
Insolvency of the German debtor → Risk of recovering only a fraction of the amount owed (often only around 2%). | We file your claim in the insolvency proceedings and assert all rights, including those from the retention of title. |
Incomplete or incorrect documentation → Inability to prove the claim in court, dismissal of the action on formal grounds. | We prepare complete documentation that will stand up before German authorities and courts. |
Wrong choice of legal procedure → Unnecessary costs, loss of time, ineffective recovery (e.g., choosing Czech law). | We provide legal consultations and opinions on the basis of which we recommend the most effective strategy (e.g., Mahnverfahren vs. EPO). |
High enforcement costs → Recovery costs can exceed the value of the claim if the debtor has no assets. | We conduct a cost-benefit analysis and help obtain information about the debtor's assets before initiating costly enforcement. |
Lack of knowledge of German laws and language → Inability to communicate effectively with courts and authorities, procedural errors. | We provide a complete legal service in both Czech and German and handle all communication with the German side. |
The Final Stage: Enforcement in Germany (Zwangsvollstreckung)
Obtaining an enforceable title, whether a German Vollstreckungsbescheid or a European Payment Order, is a key milestone, but not the end of the road. It is merely the "ticket" to the final stage, which is the enforcement itself (Zwangsvollstreckung). It is only here that a theoretical claim on paper turns into real money in your account.
The key figure here is the judicial officer (Gerichtsvollzieher), who carries out the individual actions based on your instruction. German law offers several ways to get to the debtor's assets:
Enforcement against movable property (Sachpfändung): Seizure and subsequent sale of valuables, vehicles, machinery, or office equipment in a public auction.
Enforcement against claims (Forderungspfändung): A very common and effective method, which primarily includes garnishing a bank account (Kontopfändung) or ordering deductions from the debtor's wages or other income.
Enforcement against real estate (Zwangsversteigerung): Forced sale of real estate owned by the debtor in a court auction.
ARROWS does not stop its work at obtaining a court decision. We also represent our clients throughout the entire enforcement process in Germany. We communicate with judicial officers, file the necessary applications, and ensure that the enforcement is carried out as quickly and efficiently as possible.
Your Strategic Partner for Success in the German Market: Why ARROWS?
Recovering debts in Germany is not just about knowing the law. It's about the right strategy, speed, precision, and a deep understanding of the local business and legal environment. It's about the ability to apply the right pressure at the right time and choose the most effective procedure that minimises your costs and maximises your chances of success.
At ARROWS, we specialise in this area. Our many years of experience and broad client portfolio, which includes more than 150 joint-stock companies, 250 limited liability companies, and 51 municipalities and regions, are a guarantee of our expertise and quality. Thanks to the ARROWS International network, built over ten years, we handle cross-border cases practically every day and can navigate the European legal environment with confidence and ease.
We provide our clients with a comprehensive service:
Drafting and reviewing contracts that minimise the risk of bad debts arising.
Effective and assertive out-of-court debt collection.
Representation before German courts and administrative authorities at all stages of the proceedings.
Preparation of all documentation and materials required by law.
Expert training for your employees and management to help your company avoid similar problems in the future.
We pride ourselves on speed, high quality, and building long-term relationships. Moreover, thanks to our extensive network of contacts, we can connect our clients when we see interesting business or investment opportunities. We would be happy to hear about your business plan too.
Are you dealing with an unpaid debt in Germany? Don't wait until it's too late and your claim becomes statute-barred. Contact us today and arrange a no-obligation consultation. Our experts will assess your case and propose the best strategy for recovering your money quickly.
About the author
Disclaimer:
The information contained in this article is for general informational purposes only and serves as a basic guide to the issue as of 2026. Although we strive for maximum accuracy, laws and their interpretation evolve over time. We are ARROWS Law Firm, a member of the Czech Bar Association (our supervisory authority), and for the maximum security of our clients, we are insured for professional liability with a limit of CZK 350,000,000. To verify the current wording of the regulations and their application to your specific situation, it is necessary to contact ARROWS Law Firm directly (consultation@arws.cz). We are not liable for any damages arising from the independent use of the information in this article without prior individual legal consultation.


