Právní ochrana majetku spolku v daňových a dotačních sporech

Key takeaways
Tax Specifics for Associations: When Does Public Benefit Become a Tax Liability?
The key to tax optimisation and legal certainty is the strict and demonstrable separation of the main (non-profit) activity from any ancillary (economic) activity. The main activity fulfils the association's mission and is usually financed by membership fees, donations, or grants.
Ancillary economic activity, such as renting out association premises or selling promotional items, is permissible, but it must meet two conditions: it must support the main activity, and any profit from it must never be distributed among the members.
Which Income is Subject to Tax and Which is Not?
A common mistake is the assumption that if the association as a whole is not profitable, no tax obligations apply to it. The opposite is true. The Tax Authority does not assess the association's finances as a single entity but analyses individual types of income and activities separately.
Income that is not subject to tax primarily includes grants from public budgets and income from the main non-profit activity, but only on the condition that the related costs are higher than this income. Therefore, if you organise a charity run, for example, where the organisational costs exceed the entry fees collected, this income is not subject to tax.
Another category is income exempt from tax. Although this income is subject to tax, the law exempts it from tax liability. This typically includes membership fees, provided their collection and amount are stipulated in the association's statutes, as well as gratuitous income, i.e., donations.
However, the greatest attention must be paid to income that is always taxable. This category includes, without exception, income from advertising, interest on deposits, and rental income. It also includes all income from ancillary economic activities and—most treacherously—income from any profitable part of the main activity.
The "Sliced Activity" Trap: How a Loss-Making Event Can Generate Tax
Herein lies the greatest and least obvious tax risk for associations. The tax administration has the right to "slice" a single activity into profitable and loss-making parts. Imagine your association organises a professional conference. You set a subsidised, loss-making admission fee for students, but for participants from the commercial sector, you set a price that generates a profit. Even if the conference as a whole is at a loss, the profit from the commercial tickets becomes taxable income.
This approach means that the loss from one part of an activity cannot be offset by the profit from another. For the Tax Authority, there is only a loss-making part (which is not subject to tax) and a profitable part (which is subject to tax). This places enormous demands on maintaining detailed and separate accounting records for individual income streams, something many associations are not prepared for.
In this complex area, the lawyers at ARROWS can help you set up accounting and tax processes that fully comply with the law and minimise the risk of an additional tax assessment.
When Must You File a Tax Return?
An association does not have to file a tax return if it only has income that is not subject to tax, is exempt from tax, or from which tax is collected by withholding at the source (e.g., interest on a bank account). However, as soon as the association generates even a single crown of taxable income—for example, from the sale of an advertising banner on its website or from a few profitable tickets to an otherwise loss-making event—it has an unconditional obligation to file a corporate income tax return.
For the tax assessment of an association's income, it is crucial to distinguish the source of the income and the purpose for which it is used. Different types of income may have different tax treatment from an income tax perspective.
Membership fees, for example, the regular annual fee of a sports club member, can be tax-exempt if they meet the statutory conditions. In practice, it is important that the obligation of members to pay membership fees and the basic rules for them are derived from the statutes or another corresponding internal regulation of the association. An inappropriate setup can lead to their tax treatment being challenged.
Donations also represent a specific category, for example, a financial gift provided by a supporter for the association's activities. For their correct assessment, it is essential that they are genuinely a gratuitous transaction. If the association provides the donor with advertising, promotional, or other services in return, it may no longer be considered a donation from a tax perspective, but rather income from advertising or other gainful activity.
With grants from public budgets, in addition to their tax treatment, increased attention must be paid primarily to the conditions under which they were provided. The association must be able to prove that it used the funds for the specified purpose and complied with all obligations arising from the grant programme or agreement. Violation of these rules may result in the obligation to return the grant or part of it.
Different treatment may also apply to income from the association's main activity. If a specific activity is carried out in accordance with the association's mission and the related expenses exceed the income, its result may have a different tax regime than a profitable activity. A typical example could be the low entry fee collected when organising a charity run. However, it is essential for the association to be able to provide accounting evidence for the income and related expenses of that specific activity.
Conversely, profitable activities within the main activity may be included in the tax base. An example could be a commercially set admission fee for a conference or other event. The mere fact that the association subsequently uses the profit for its non-profit activities does not automatically mean that the income will not be taxable.
Income from ancillary or economic activities, such as renting out a clubhouse or selling advertising, requires separate attention. These activities are generally associated with tax liabilities, and the association should ensure they are strictly separated in the accounts from its main activity. The correct differentiation of individual types of income and costs is key in practice, both for the correct determination of the tax liability and for a potential audit by the tax administrator.
Grants – A Good Servant, but a Bad Master. How to Avoid a Breach of Budgetary Discipline?
For many associations, grants are a vital source of funding. However, their administration is bound by extremely strict rules, and the penalties for violating them can be ruinous for an association. The key concept here is "breach of budgetary discipline," the definition of which is relentless and broad.
What is a Breach of Budgetary Discipline?
According to the law, it is any unauthorised use or retention of funds provided from a public budget. Unauthorised use is not just embezzlement. It can be:
Use of funds for a different purpose: Even if the purpose is similar and meaningful, if it does not exactly match the text of the grant agreement, it is a breach.
Violation of any condition of the agreement: This could be failure to meet deadlines, incorrect record-keeping, lack of project publicity, or purchasing from an unapproved supplier.
Inability to prove the use of funds: If your accounting is not sufficiently conclusive to document every expense, the funds are deemed to have been used without authorisation.
The legal framework here does not recognise the concept of a "minor error" or "acting in good faith." The system is set up so that even an administrative mistake with no intent to gain is penalised as harshly as intentional fraud. There is no room for flexibility; compliance with the conditions must be one hundred percent.
The Audit Process and Penalties That Can Destroy an Association
If the grant provider (e.g., a ministry or municipality) discovers a mistake during an audit, it first calls on the association to rectify it. If this does not happen, or is not possible, the entire matter is handed over to the relevant Tax Authority, which initiates proceedings ex officio. These proceedings are conducted under the Czech Tax Code, which is a highly formalised and, for a layperson, confusing process in which the association is in the position of a tax subject.
The consequences are drastic:
Levy: The association is obliged to return the entire portion of the grant that was used in violation of the rules. This can be up to 100% of the funds provided.
Penalty: A penalty of 0.1% of the levy amount is added for each day of delay. It is calculated from the day the rules were breached until payment. The penalty can reach a maximum of the levy amount itself.
To illustrate: If an association improperly uses a grant of CZK 500,000 and an audit discovers this after two years (730 days), the penalty will be:
Levy: CZK 500,000
Penalty: CZK 500,000 * 0.001 * 730 = CZK 365,000
Total amount payable: CZK 865,000
Such an amount is fatal for most associations and leads directly to insolvency. Although it is possible to apply for a waiver of these penalties within one year after they become final, the decision is not made by the Tax Authority, but by the body that provided the grant (e.g., the municipal council). This is at their discretion, not a legal entitlement.
How a Breach of Budgetary Discipline Becomes the Chairman's Personal Problem
Here, the risks to the association are directly linked to the personal liability of its management. The imposition of a ruinous levy and penalty is the most common cause of an association's insolvency. This insolvency, caused by a failure to comply with grant rules, establishes a direct claim for damages against the statutory body (the committee, the chairman). The damage in this case is precisely quantifiable—it is the sum of the levy and the penalty.
If the statutory body caused this through its negligence (e.g., by not studying the agreement, poor accounting), it has breached its duty of due managerial care and is personally liable for the resulting damage. ARROWS provides expert representation in proceedings with the Tax Authority and helps clients effectively argue for the reduction or waiver of penalties.
Duty of Due Managerial Care: When You Are Liable for the Association's Debts with Your Own Assets
A dangerous myth persists among members of associations' statutory bodies that they are not personally liable for the association's obligations. While the basic principle is that an association, as a legal entity, is liable for its debts with its own assets and the members' assets are separate, this principle has a crucial exception that can have fatal consequences for officials.
Piercing the Veil: The Duty of Due Managerial Care
The protective barrier between the association's assets and the assets of its officials falls the moment a member of the statutory body breaches their legal duty to act with due managerial care. This duty, enshrined in Section 159 of the Czech Civil Code, requires every member of an elected body to perform their function with the necessary loyalty, knowledge, and diligence.
What does this mean in practice?
Loyalty: To always act in the best interest of the association, not in one's own interest or the interest of a third party.
Knowledge and diligence: To make decisions based on sufficient information. This is not a duty to be an expert in everything, but a duty to recognise when a matter exceeds one's own competence and to actively seek professional advice—legal, tax, or economic. Ignoring obvious risks or relying on lay assumptions is considered negligence.
Examples That Lead to Personal Liability
A breach of the duty of due managerial care is not just a theoretical concept. It involves specific failures that can take the form of both action and inaction:
Entering into a clearly disadvantageous contract: Signing a lease with an unreasonably high rent or selling the association's property below market value without proper justification.
Neglecting tax and accounting obligations: Failing to file a tax return on time, leading to penalties, or repeatedly failing to file financial statements in the Collection of Deeds, which the law explicitly considers a breach of this duty.
Inaction in a crisis situation: Ignoring the deteriorating financial situation of the association, not addressing debts, and failing to take crisis measures, which can lead to insolvency.
Poor grant management: As described above, failure to comply with grant conditions leading to penalties is a textbook example of a breach of the duty of due managerial care.
How Does Financial Liability Arise?
If an action (or inaction) in breach of the duty of due managerial care causes damage to the association, the member of the body is obliged to compensate for this damage in full. The association, represented for example by the general meeting, can also enforce this compensation through the courts.
The worst-case scenario occurs if the association becomes insolvent as a result of this damage and cannot pay its debts to creditors. In such a case, the member of the statutory body is liable for the association's debts directly to its creditors, up to the amount of the damage they caused to the association and did not compensate. Your personal assets thus become a source for satisfying the association's creditors.
The legal standard of care has shifted from a passive "do nothing obviously wrong" to an active duty to "do everything reasonably foreseeable to make the right decision." A key part of this duty is the ability to admit the limits of one's own expertise and to contact professional advisors in a timely manner.
The documented fact that you relied on qualified legal advice when making a complex decision is the best defence against a potential accusation of negligence. Our lawyers at ARROWS will help you set up internal control mechanisms and contractual documentation that protect both the association and its statutory bodies.
Potential Problems | How ARROWS Helps (consultation@arws.cz) |
Incorrect assessment of taxable income, mixing of main and ancillary activities. Potential problem: Additional tax assessment, penalties, and late payment interest from the Tax Authority. | We will conduct a tax and legal analysis of your income and set up internal processes for the proper separation of activities. |
Use of a grant in violation of its conditions, administrative errors. Potential problem: Obligation to return the entire grant and pay a penalty of up to 100% of the grant amount, which can lead to the association's insolvency. | Representation in proceedings with the Tax Authority and the grant provider. We will help you prepare arguments for the reduction or waiver of penalties. |
Breach of the duty of due managerial care (e.g., entering into a disadvantageous contract, neglecting duties). Potential problem: Personal liability of the chairman or committee members for the association's debts with their own assets. | Preparation of internal guidelines and review of contractual documentation to protect both the association and its management. |
Receiving a service from abroad (e.g., Facebook advertising) without registering for VAT. Potential problem: Status of an "identified person," obligation to retroactively pay VAT, additional tax assessment, and penalties. | Legal consultation on international transactions and ensuring compliance with all tax obligations. |
The International Dimension: What to Watch Out for with Foreign Grants and Services
In a globalised world, associations are increasingly encountering an international element—whether it's grants from EU funds or the use of common online services from foreign providers. These transactions carry specific risks that are often completely overlooked.
Accounting for Foreign Grants
Grants from the European Union or other foreign sources are generally treated for tax purposes in the same way as domestic grants from public budgets—they are not subject to income tax. However, their accounting treatment is governed by special Czech accounting standards, which require precise records and monitoring of their use.
The Hidden VAT Trap: The "Identified Person" Status
The biggest and least intuitive risk lies in the area of value-added tax. Even an association that is not and never will be a standard VAT payer can unwittingly become a so-called identified person. This status arises automatically and creates specific VAT obligations.
The most common trigger is receiving a service from a provider who is not based in the Czech Republic. This applies to completely ordinary and everyday expenses, such as:
Payments for advertising on social networks (Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn).
Payments for online marketing tools (Google Ads, Mailchimp).
Purchase of foreign software or cloud services.
The moment your association receives such a service, even for just a few euros, it becomes an identified person and the following obligations arise:
1. Registration: It must register with the relevant Tax Authority as an identified person within 15 days.
2. Filing a return and paying tax: For each month in which it received a foreign service, it must file a VAT return and pay Czech VAT (usually 21%) on the price of the service received. This is the so-called "reverse-charge" principle.
3. No right to a deduction: Unlike a regular VAT payer, an identified person cannot claim this paid tax back. It is a direct cost for the association.
This obligation is invisible to most association officials. An invoice from the Irish company Google for EUR 100 contains no mention of Czech VAT. Nevertheless, the Czech association is obliged to calculate the tax itself (EUR 21), file a tax return, and pay this amount to the Czech Tax Authority. If it fails to do so, it is committing tax evasion and risks an additional tax assessment, including penalties. The Tax Authority considers you an identified person regardless of whether you have registered.
Thanks to our international network, ARROWS International, we handle the tax and legal aspects of cross-border transactions on a daily basis and will ensure that your association meets all international obligations. You can find more about this service on our website.
Protect Your Association and Yourself – with Professional Legal Support
Running an association is a complex discipline where good intentions meet the harsh reality of tax laws, grant rules, and personal liability. As we have shown, ignorance of the law is no excuse and can lead to fatal consequences—from unexpected additional tax assessments and ruinous penalties for administrative errors in grants, to the personal liability of statutory bodies for the association's debts.
In this context, proactive legal advice is not an expense, but an essential investment in the security and stability of your organisation and in the protection of your personal assets. The correct setup of internal processes, careful review of contracts, and timely consultation on more complex issues can save you not only financial resources but, above all, the time and stress that you can instead devote to fulfilling your association's mission.
Don't wait for a small uncertainty to turn into a serious legal problem. The correct setup of financial and control processes is key to the safe operation of your association. If you are unsure about any of the areas mentioned, do not hesitate to contact us. The ARROWS team is ready to review your procedures and provide you with the certainty you need for your activities.
About the author
Disclaimer:
The information contained in this article is for general informational purposes only and serves as a basic guide to the issue as of 2026. Although we strive for maximum accuracy, laws and their interpretation evolve over time. We are ARROWS Law Firm, a member of the Czech Bar Association (our supervisory authority), and for the maximum security of our clients, we are insured for professional liability with a limit of CZK 350,000,000. To verify the current wording of the regulations and their application to your specific situation, it is necessary to contact ARROWS Law Firm directly (consultation@arws.cz). We are not liable for any damages arising from the independent use of the information in this article without prior individual legal consultation.


