Copyright Protection of Project Documentation
Expert Opinions and Licensing Agreements
Copyright protection of project documentation means that owning drawings or digital files does not itself give an investor the right to use, modify or build from the design. Those rights must be secured through an appropriate licence, and an exclusive licence may be critical for a unique development. This article explains how to verify and structure rights so they do not obstruct construction, financing or a future sale.

Key takeaways
Your Project Is More Than Just Plans: It's a Work of Copyright Protected by Law
The author is always a natural person—the architect or designer who created the work. Even if you hire a renowned architectural firm, the copyright primarily belongs to the specific individuals on its team. It is crucial to understand that owning the physical plans or digital files does not mean owning the creative work itself, which is intangible. This fact is a source of frequent misunderstandings.
Copyright is divided into two basic components with different legal regimes:
Moral Rights: These are inseparably linked to the author's person and cannot be sold, transferred, or waived. They include, for example, the right to be identified as the author and the right to the integrity of the work. This means the author can prevent changes to the project that would diminish its artistic value and damage their reputation.
Economic Rights: These are rights of an economic nature. They include the author's exclusive right to decide on any use of the work—for example, its reproduction (copying plans), distribution (use in marketing), or the construction itself. The author can grant these rights to another person through a license, and they last for the author's lifetime plus 70 years after their death.
The legal framework thus creates a natural tension between the developer's commercial need to flexibly modify the project and the architect's moral right to preserve the integrity of their vision. The developer's goal is to maximize the return on investment, which often requires plan adjustments in response to market developments, material prices, or unexpected site conditions. The architect's moral rights, on the other hand, protect their artistic vision and reputation.
Understanding this dual nature of rights is the cornerstone of any successful strategy for protecting a development project.
The Key to Using a Project? A Properly Structured License Agreement
For a developer or investor to legally use the project documentation in any way—from applying for a building permit to marketing and the construction itself—they need to obtain authorization from the author. This authorization is a license agreement. Without it, any handling of the project constitutes an unauthorized infringement of copyright.
When negotiating a license, it is crucial to distinguish between two basic types, whose business impacts are diametrically different:
Non-Exclusive License: The investor acquires the right to use the project, but the author retains the right to sell the same project to other interested parties or to use it further themselves. If the agreement does not explicitly state the type of license, it is presumed to be a non-exclusive license. This option is usually unsuitable for a unique development project.
Exclusive License: This ensures that only the acquirer (investor) has the right to use the work within the specified scope. The author may not grant the license to anyone else and is generally also obliged to refrain from using it themselves. Under Czech legislation, this type of license must be in writing to be valid.
A well-drafted exclusive license agreement is not just a permit; it becomes a strategic business asset. Its quality and scope directly affect the value of the entire project, its marketability, and its ability to secure bank financing. Banks and potential buyers evaluate not only the land and plans but, above all, the certainty that the rights to the project are clear, comprehensive, and fully transferable.
A license with restrictions that do not allow for assignment or sublicensing is a defective asset from an acquisition perspective, reducing the project's value and complicating the developer's exit strategy.
The choice between an exclusive and a non-exclusive license is not just a legal formality; it is a crucial business decision. Our lawyers at ARROWS have extensive experience in drafting license agreements that accurately reflect our clients' commercial intentions and protect them from future risks, such as the discovery of a 'twin' of their unique project a few blocks away.
Common Mistakes in Licensing Agreements and Their Consequences
A carefully prepared license agreement is the foundation of success. Underestimating the details can lead to serious complications. The following table summarizes the most common mistakes and shows how to prevent them.
Risk and Potential Problems | How ARROWS Helps |
Vaguely defined purpose and scope of the license | Drafting precise contractual documentation that defines all anticipated uses of the work, thereby preventing future disputes and unexpected costs. |
Lack of authorization to modify the project | Negotiating the author's explicit consent to changes directly in the license agreement, including the option for a third party (e.g., another designer) to make the changes. |
Prohibition of assignment and sublicensing | Preparing contractual clauses that ensure full transferability of rights and flexibility for the entire project lifecycle, including its financing and sale. |
Time or territorial limitations on the license | Securing a license for the entire duration of the economic rights (author's life + 70 years) and with worldwide scope, if the project's commercial intent requires it. |
The agreement completely omits licensing provisions | Comprehensive legal advice and review of work contracts to ensure that licensing provisions are always an integral and correctly formulated part of them. |
When the Project Changes: When Do You (Not) Need the Architect's Consent?
The most common source of disputes between developers and architects is project changes. As mentioned, the author has an inalienable right to the integrity of the work. However, the law also considers practical needs and allows for changes to the structure that are strictly necessary and do not diminish the value of the architectural work.
The problem arises in defining this "value." It is not financial value but artistic and architectural value, which is a highly subjective category. What a developer considers a necessary optimization, an architect may perceive as a devaluation of their creative intent. In the event of a dispute, it is not the opinion of either party that decides, but the objective assessment of a court-appointed expert.
This is where an expert opinion comes into play. The court will request an opinion from an independent expert in the field of architecture, who will assess whether the change was truly necessary and whether it diminished the architectural value of the work. The conclusions of such an opinion are often decisive for the outcome of the dispute. It is a costly and lengthy process that is best avoided.
An interesting paradox of copyright law is that demolishing a building is not considered an infringement of the intangible copyrighted work, whereas rebuilding it is. This leads to absurd situations where it may be legally safer for an investor to demolish the entire building and construct a new one rather than attempting a renovation without the author's consent.
Disputes over project changes are costly and can halt construction for years. At ARROWS, we therefore emphasize prevention and provide legal consultations that help find solutions acceptable to both parties before a dispute escalates. If a dispute does arise, we provide our clients with top-tier representation in court, where proper argumentation and working with expert opinions are key.
International Projects? No Problem with ARROWS International
In the globalized world of development, it is not uncommon for a foreign architect to work on a Czech project or for a Czech developer to expand abroad. Copyright protection at the international level is primarily governed by the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, to which the Czech Republic is a signatory.
This convention is based on two fundamental principles that simplify international protection:
1. Principle of National Treatment: An author from one member country is entitled to the same level of protection in another member country as that country provides to its own authors.
2. Principle of Automatic Protection: Protection arises automatically upon the creation of the work and is not conditional on any registration or other formality.
What does this mean for you in practice? Your project, designed by a Czech architect, is automatically protected in Germany, Poland, or the United Arab Emirates. Likewise, if you use a design from a renowned foreign architect for your project in the Czech Republic, you must fully respect their copyright according to both Czech and international standards.
Handling legal issues with an international element is our daily practice. Thanks to the ARROWS International network, built over ten years, we have experts directly in the respective countries and can ensure a smooth process for our clients in cross-border transactions, acquisitions with foreign partners, or licensing agreements with international architectural firms. Our experience opens the door to international investment opportunities for you.
Why Choose ARROWS to Protect Your Investments?
As you can see, copyright for project documentation is not a marginal legal formality but a strategic element that determines the success or failure of your investment. Underestimating these risks can lead to millions in losses, while a correctly implemented strategy protects your assets and opens up new opportunities.
At ARROWS, we specialize in this area. Our experience from long-term collaboration with over 150 joint-stock companies, 250 limited liability companies (s.r.o.), and 51 municipalities and regions gives us a unique insight into our clients' needs. We pride ourselves on speed, commercial thinking, and the highest quality of service.
Whether you need to draft internal guidelines, prepare a bulletproof license agreement to protect you from fines, obtain necessary permits, or be represented in court, we are here for you. Furthermore, we offer certified professional training for your teams to help them effectively prevent risks.
But our services don't end with legal clauses. We believe in connecting businesses. We are happy to connect clients with interesting investment or business opportunities and are always ready to listen to your business ideas.
Don't leave the fate of your project to chance. Protect your investment and ensure your peace of mind. Contact us today to arrange a no-obligation consultation. Our team of experts is ready to analyze your situation and propose a tailor-made solution.
About the author
Disclaimer:
The information contained in this article is for general informational purposes only and serves as a basic guide to the issue as of 2026. Although we strive for maximum accuracy, laws and their interpretation evolve over time. We are ARROWS Law Firm, a member of the Czech Bar Association (our supervisory authority), and for the maximum security of our clients, we are insured for professional liability with a limit of CZK 350,000,000. To verify the current wording of the regulations and their application to your specific situation, it is necessary to contact ARROWS Law Firm directly (consultation@arws.cz). We are not liable for any damages arising from the independent use of the information in this article without prior individual legal consultation.


