Skip to content

Member Facing Enforcement Proceedings and Their Potential Expulsion from the Company

Mgr. Pavel Čech
Published:Updated:

A business partner subject to enforcement proceedings can jeopardize a company's stability, financing, and a planned investor entry, but the proceedings themselves do not automatically provide grounds for their exclusion. A solution can be an agreement, a court-ordered exclusion for a particularly serious breach of duties, or the purchase of their share in an enforcement auction. The article explains when these individual procedures can be used and how to protect the company from the entry of a third party.

The picture shows an expert in resolving enforcement proceedings against company partners.

Key takeaways

A shareholder's enforcement proceeding is publicly visible. Information that a shareholder's interest has been affected is searchable in the Commercial Register and the Central Register of Enforcement Proceedings, which damages the company's credibility with partners and banks.
Banks may worsen credit terms. An enforcement proceeding against a shareholder increases credit risk, which can lead to a reassessment of existing loans, less favorable financing terms, or the rejection of new applications.
The enforcement officer will block any disposal of the shareholder's interest. An enforcement order prohibits the shareholder from disposing of their interest and prevents the company from consenting to its transfer, which can paralyze a company sale, an investor's entry, or a restructuring.
There is a risk of a third party entering the company. The interest of a shareholder subject to an enforcement proceeding may be sold at auction, allowing an unknown or competing person to acquire the interest and disrupt the company's operations.
ARROWS law firm

A Ticking Time Bomb in Your Company: Why Is a Partner Facing Enforcement Proceedings a Serious Risk?

The first and most serious risk is a reputational threat. Information about the enforcement proceedings is publicly available in the Central Register of Executions, and the seizure of a share is publicly visible in the Commercial Register. Business partners, banks, insurance companies, and potential investors now routinely vet their counterparts. Discovering that a key person in your company is facing enforcement proceedings immediately raises doubts about the financial stability and credibility of the entire company.

Closely related to a damaged reputation is the threat of financial paralysis. Banks may perceive a partner's enforcement proceedings as an increased credit risk, which can lead to a reassessment of existing loan agreements, worse conditions for further financing, or the outright rejection of a new loan application. The company can thus find itself without the necessary operating funds.

Last but not least, there is the risk of operational chaos. The process of enforcement and the potential expulsion of a partner can create tension and disputes within the company, paralyzing strategic decision-making. Furthermore, by issuing an enforcement order, the bailiff prohibits the partner from disposing of their share and the company from consenting to its transfer, which can block planned transactions, an investor's entry, or a company restructuring.

Risk to be addressed and potential problems and penalties

How ARROWS helps

Loss of trust with banks and business partners: Reassessment of loan agreements, worsening of business conditions, damage to the company's reputation.

Legal consultation and crisis communication: We will prepare a strategy for communicating with key partners and banks to minimize the impact.

Decision-making paralysis in the company: Inability to pass key general meeting resolutions, blockage of a company sale or investor entry.

Preparation of documents for the general meeting and court proceedings: We will secure all documentation for a swift and legally sound expulsion of the partner.

Entry of a third party into the company: The risk that an unknown or competing entity will acquire the share in an auction, disrupting the company's operations.

Legal support for the share purchase: We will advise on how to effectively exercise the pre-emptive right and prepare all contractual documentation for the share transfer.

Legal uncertainty and delays: Lengthy court disputes over the validity of the expulsion or the amount of the settlement share, which drain the company financially and in terms of time.

Representation before courts and administrative authorities: With our experience from over 450 corporate clients, we will guide you effectively through the entire process.

ARROWS law firm

Solution Options: From Agreement to Forced Expulsion

The situation with a problematic partner can be resolved in several ways, from amicable to forced. The choice of the right approach depends on the specific circumstances, particularly the partner's willingness to cooperate and the nature of their misconduct.

  1. Agreement to terminate participation: The fastest and least confrontational route, which requires the consent of all partners.

  2. Expulsion by the general meeting (caducity procedure): Possible especially in cases where the partner is in default with their contribution or supplementary contribution obligation.

  3. Expulsion by court order: A last resort for cases where a partner breaches their duties in a particularly serious manner.

  4. Acquisition of the share in an enforcement auction: A strategic option for the other partners to gain control over the share and prevent a third party from entering the company.

Expulsion of a Partner by Court Order: When and How to File a Lawsuit?

The court-ordered expulsion of a partner under Section 204 of the Business Corporations Act is a last resort (ultima ratio) that can be taken if a partner breaches their duties in a particularly serious manner, thereby jeopardizing the company's functioning. However, this process has strict rules.

DO YOU NEED LEGAL HELP?

Get in touch — we're happy to help.

ARROWS law firm

Written Call for Rectification

Before filing a lawsuit, it is absolutely necessary to send the partner a written call to fulfill their duties and explicitly warn them of the possibility of expulsion. Without meeting this condition, the court will dismiss the lawsuit without further consideration. This call is not just a formality but a key strategic step. A correctly formulated and delivered call forms the basis of a successful lawsuit and, in some cases, can lead to an agreement without the need for litigation.

The lawsuit is filed on behalf of the company by its statutory body. However, if the statutory body is inactive, following a legislative amendment, any other partner can file a so-called derivative action. In such a case, this partner is also authorized to take the preceding steps, including sending the call for rectification.

The Reason Must Be a 'Particularly Serious Breach of Duty'

The law does not precisely define this term. However, case law indicates that it must be conduct that fundamentally harms the company's interests. This could include, for example, a breach of the duty of loyalty, damaging the company's reputation, engaging in competitive activities contrary to the articles of association, or systematically abusing rights to block the company's operations.

It is crucial to distinguish between a breach of a partner's duties and a breach of an executive director's duties. A partner cannot be expelled for mismanaging the company as an executive director. For managerial misconduct, they can be removed from the position of executive director and potentially sued for damages, but they cannot be expelled as a partner for this reason. The grounds for expulsion must be a breach of their duties arising from their role as a partner.

FAQ – Legal Tips on Court-Ordered Expulsion

1. What exactly does 'particularly serious breach of duty' mean? Could it be that a partner is not communicating with me?

Non-communication alone is usually not enough. It must be conduct that genuinely harms the company, such as damaging its reputation, engaging in competitive activity contrary to the articles of association, or abusing rights to block the company's operations. The assessment is always individual, so it is crucial to have your situation analyzed by a lawyer. For a quick analysis, contact our Prague-based legal team at consultation@arws.cz.

2. Our partner is also an executive director and is mismanaging the company. Can we expel them on that basis?

No, they cannot be expelled for a breach of their duties as an executive director. However, you can remove them from the position of executive director and potentially sue them for damages. Expulsion would only be an option if they also breached their duties as a partner, such as the duty of loyalty. We would be happy to help you distinguish between these two roles and choose the right course of action. Contact our Czech legal team at consultation@arws.cz.
ARROWS law firm

Enforcement on a Share: An Opportunity for Other Partners

Initiating enforcement proceedings on a problematic partner's share doesn't have to be just a threat. On the contrary, it opens up a unique opportunity for the other partners to resolve the situation and gain full control over the company. The enforcement process can paradoxically serve as a catalyst for an inevitable restructuring of ownership relations.

Once the bailiff issues an enforcement order to seize the share, it is delivered to the company. The company is obliged to inform the bailiff whether the share is transferable and under what conditions. The primary method of monetizing the share is a public auction, of which the company must inform the other partners.

Who can you turn to?

JUDr. Jakub Dohnal, Ph.D., LL.M.

JUDr. Jakub Dohnal, Ph.D., LL.M.

advokát, řídící partner

dohnal@arws.cz
JUDr. Ondřej Stehlík, LL.M., MBA

JUDr. Ondřej Stehlík, LL.M., MBA

advokát, partner

stehlik@arws.cz
ARROWS law firm

This is the key moment. The other partners have a statutory advantage similar to a pre-emptive right: if they make the same highest bid in the auction as another bidder, the share will be awarded to them. This mechanism gives them a powerful tool to prevent an undesirable third party from entering the company and, at the same time, to elegantly buy out the problematic colleague's share.

If the share is not sold even in a repeated auction, the partner's participation in the company terminates on the day the notice of the unsuccessful auction is delivered. In such a case, the creditor is satisfied from the so-called settlement share, which the company pays to the former partner.

Risk to be addressed and potential problems and penalties

How ARROWS helps

Improperly conducted court proceedings: Formal errors in the lawsuit or in the prior call can lead to the dismissal of the action and unnecessary costs.

Preparation of complete procedural documentation: We will ensure that the lawsuit and all preceding steps meet all legal requirements and will stand up in court.

Dispute over the valuation of the share for the auction: Undervaluation or overvaluation of the share can harm either the creditors or the potential buyers (the other partners).

Legal opinions and cooperation with experts: We will provide the legal framework for the valuation and cooperate with vetted experts to ensure a realistic and defensible valuation.

Complications in the enforcement auction: Ignorance of auction rules and the correct exercise of the pre-emptive right can lead to the loss of the share to a third party.

Legal consultation and representation in the process: We will guide you through the entire auction process and ensure that your rights are duly and timely exercised.

Disagreements over the amount of the settlement share: If the auction fails, a protracted dispute over the calculation of the settlement share may arise, burdening the company.

Review and preparation of contractual documentation: We will analyze your articles of association and propose clear calculation rules to prevent future disputes.

ARROWS law firm

The Power of Prevention: How a Properly Drafted Articles of Association Can Protect You

The best crisis management is prevention. The articles of association are not just a formal document required to establish a company; they are a key risk management tool. They can be seen as a 'prenuptial agreement' for your business—setting the rules for when things don't go according to plan.

A carefully prepared articles of association can significantly strengthen your position:

  • Restriction on the transferability of the share: You can set special conditions for the transfer of a share. This complicates the sale of the share in an enforcement auction to anyone other than the existing partners.

  • Specification of a partner's duties: The articles can clearly define duties beyond the statutory scope, such as a detailed non-compete clause or a detailed regulation of the duty of loyalty. A breach of these will then be an more easily provable reason for expulsion.

  • Pre-emptive right: Although a statutory 'priority right' in an auction exists, the articles of association can further strengthen the position of the other partners by establishing a contractual pre-emptive right in the event of enforcement proceedings.

  • Clear rules for the settlement share: The articles of association can and should define a precise and unambiguous method for calculating the settlement share. This will prevent lengthy and costly disputes over its amount in the event that the share auction is unsuccessful.

Properly drafting the articles of association is the cornerstone of a healthy company and the prevention of future disputes. We address this as part of our services in the field of corporate law. You can find more about this service on our website.

Solutions with an International Element? Rely on the ARROWS International Network

If the partner facing enforcement proceedings is a foreigner or the enforcement title was issued abroad, the situation becomes more complicated. It is necessary to apply not only Czech law but also the relevant European regulations and international treaties.

If the enforcement title was issued in another EU member state, its enforcement in the Czech Republic is governed by the Brussels I bis Regulation (EU Regulation No. 1215/2012). This regulation significantly simplifies the process, as a judgment issued in one EU state is enforceable in others without the need for further recognition proceedings.

When paying out a settlement share to a foreign partner, tax aspects must be considered. This income is subject to withholding tax in the Czech Republic. However, its rate (typically 15%) may be reduced or even completely eliminated based on the relevant double taxation treaty, which takes precedence over Czech law.

Thanks to the ARROWS International network, built over ten years, we handle cases with an international element on a daily basis. Whether it's communicating with foreign authorities, applying international treaties, or optimizing cross-border transactions for tax purposes, we have the necessary know-how. Do you need legal assistance with an international scope? Contact us at consultation@arws.cz.

Our specialists will help you

Mgr. Vojtěch Sucharda

Mgr. Vojtěch Sucharda

advokát, partner

sucharda@arws.cz
JUDr. Zuzana Liškařová

JUDr. Zuzana Liškařová

advokátka

liskarova@arws.cz
ARROWS law firm

How Can ARROWS Specifically Help You?

Resolving a situation with a partner facing enforcement proceedings requires a comprehensive legal strategy, speed, and precision. At ARROWS, we specialize in this area, and thanks to our experience working for over 150 joint-stock companies and 250 limited liability companies, we know how to protect your company's interests. We pride ourselves on the speed and high quality of the services we provide.

In this area, we can provide you with:

  • review and preparation of articles of association that will preventively protect your company,

  • preparation of all documentation for general meetings and court proceedings to protect you from formal errors,

  • legal consultations and risk analyses to help you choose the best strategy,

  • representation before courts and administrative authorities in proceedings for the expulsion of a partner and within the enforcement proceedings,

  • expert training for company management in corporate compliance and risk management.

We are also proud of our ability to connect our clients when they have interesting investment or business opportunities, and we are always happy to hear your business ideas.

Whether you are facing an acute crisis or want to protect your company preventively, our specialists are ready to help. For a no-obligation consultation and a tailor-made solution proposal, write to our Prague-based legal team at consultation@arws.cz.

FAQ – Most Common Legal Questions about Partner Expulsion and Enforcement on a Share

1. How long does the process of expelling a partner by court order take?

Court proceedings can take several months to years, depending on the complexity of the case and the court's workload. It is crucial to have perfectly prepared documents from the outset, which can significantly speed up the process. If you are dealing with a similar problem, contact our Prague-based legal team at consultation@arws.cz.

2. Can an expelled partner defend themselves?

Yes, they can defend against the lawsuit in court and prove that the grounds for expulsion were not met. That is why it is essential to have the entire process legally watertight. To have your situation assessed, contact our Czech legal team at consultation@arws.cz.

3. What happens to the share after a partner is expelled?

The share becomes a so-called 'vacant share.' The company must deal with it in accordance with the law and the articles of association—typically by selling it. The proceeds from the sale, after deducting costs, form the settlement share for the expelled partner. Do you need advice on how to handle a vacant share? Write to our Prague-based legal team at consultation@arws.cz.

4. As the other partners, do we have to outbid other interested parties in the auction?

You don't have to. The law gives you an advantage—you just need to match the highest bid made by anyone else, and the share will be awarded to you. It's a powerful tool for maintaining control over the company. If you are considering participating in an auction, our Czech legal team is ready to guide you through the process. Contact us at consultation@arws.cz.

5. Can enforcement on a partner's share directly affect the company's bank account?

No, enforcement on a partner's share is directed against their assets (the share), not against the company's assets. A limited liability company is a separate legal entity and is not liable for its partners' debts with its own assets. The problems are indirect—reputational and operational. Do you have more questions about protecting company assets? Write to our Prague-based legal team at consultation@arws.cz.

6. Our partner facing enforcement is a foreigner. Is the procedure different?

The basic procedure for expulsion and enforcement is the same, but international aspects come into play, particularly the recognition of a foreign enforcement title and the application of double taxation treaties when paying out the settlement share. The solution requires knowledge of international law. With our ARROWS International network, we have extensive experience in this area. For a consultation, contact us at consultation@arws.cz.

DO YOU HAVE MORE QUESTIONS? GET IN TOUCH

ARROWS law firm

About the author

Mgr. Pavel Čech
Mgr. Pavel Čech

Associate

Mgr. Pavel Čech is an attorney with a professional focus on commercial and civil law, who at ARROWS provides clients with a professional yet approachable manner. Thanks to his ability to find constructive solutions, he helps companies and individuals handle complex legal situations with confidence and peace of mind.

Disclaimer:

The information contained in this article is for general informational purposes only and serves as a basic guide to the issue as of 2026. Although we strive for maximum accuracy, laws and their interpretation evolve over time. We are ARROWS Law Firm, a member of the Czech Bar Association (our supervisory authority), and for the maximum security of our clients, we are insured for professional liability with a limit of CZK 350,000,000. To verify the current wording of the regulations and their application to your specific situation, it is necessary to contact ARROWS Law Firm directly (consultation@arws.cz). We are not liable for any damages arising from the independent use of the information in this article without prior individual legal consultation.