Regulatory risks and sanctions for Czech healthcare providers

The healthcare sector is subject to a complex system of legal regulations and oversight by health insurance companies, regional authorities, the Ministry of Health, the Office for Supervision of Health Insurance, and other bodies. 

A mistake in meeting statutory obligations can cost tens of millions of Czech crowns. The most common legal risks include disputes over reimbursement of healthcare services, sanctions for breaches of staff qualification requirements, GDPR non-compliance, tax issues, and procedural errors when contractually securing the provision of care.

Without legal support, providers often try to address complex issues relating to the interpretation of health insurance law, oversight by professional chambers, and healthcare legislation, which frequently leads to costly mistakes. The attorneys at ARROWS, a Prague-based law firm, provide preventive legal support, representation during inspections, preparation of defence against fines, and protect providers’ rights in disputes with health insurance companies.

Why is healthcare one of the most complex legal environments?

Healthcare providers must navigate several interconnected regulatory systems at the same time. On the one hand, there are patients’ medical rights and ethics; on the other, legislation on public health insurance and the reimbursement conditions of individual insurers.

The core legislative framework is Act No. 372/2011 Coll., on health services and the conditions for their provision, which sets out the requirements for operating healthcare services, including authorisations, staff qualification requirements, and the keeping of medical records. 

In addition, there is Act No. 48/1997 Coll., on public health insurance, which governs the method of financing and reimbursement of healthcare services by individual health insurance companies.

These two acts overlap, and their harmonisation in practice is not always straightforward—this is precisely where many legal ambiguities and conflicts arise. On top of that, there is the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Act No. 110/2019 Coll., on the processing of personal data, which supplements and specifies the rules set by the GDPR within the Czech legal system. For a practical compliance view on how new EU rules affect sensitive data and regulated environments, see Cybersecurity and AI Act: Compliance for hospitals and public institutions. When setting up internal processes and documentation in a healthcare facility, it may also be useful to draw on practice in the area of gdpr.

A healthcare facility processes a large volume of sensitive data—health information and patients’ personal data. Breaches of the GDPR may result in fines of up to EUR 20 million (or 4% of worldwide turnover, whichever is higher).

Compliance with these standards is supervised by multiple entities. Health insurance companies carry out inspections of the provision and reporting of healthcare services and their reimbursement. The Ministry of Health and regional authorities supervise the provision of health services.

In addition, the Office for Supervision of Health Insurance (ÚZDP) oversees compliance with the Public Health Insurance Act by both health insurance companies and providers. The Czech Medical Chamber supervises the practice of the medical profession in terms of ethics and quality of care. 

The State Institute for Drug Control (SÚKL) oversees medicinal products and medical devices. Tax authorities check the correctness of VAT settlements, income tax, and other tax obligations. Where inspections lead to contested assessments or penalties, Commercial Litigation & Arbitration in the Czech Republic may be relevant for procedural strategy and representation in disputes. Typical risks also include transactions between a company and its owner, as shown in the article Loans between a company and its owner: How to correctly set interest rates and avoid additional tax assessments during an audit.

Labour offices monitor compliance with employment law regulations. The Office for Personal Data Protection (ÚOOÚ) oversees compliance with the GDPR and the Personal Data Processing Act. This multi-layered oversight system means that providers may be visited within a relatively short time by various inspections, often with differing interpretations of the same legal rule.

What are the specific legal risks and their real-world impacts?

Disputes over reimbursement of healthcare services

The greatest financial risk for providers is incorrect billing of care towards health insurance companies. In transaction contexts (e.g., acquisition of a clinic or sale of a provider), reimbursement and billing risks should be reflected in due diligence and deal documentation, as discussed in How to Prepare a Company for Sale: Legal and Tax Issues That Most Often Derail the Entire Transaction. Insurers regularly check whether care was provided under a valid contract with the health insurance company, whether the number and type of services provided correspond to reality and the patient’s health condition, whether the physician’s or healthcare staff’s qualifications matched the complexity of the care, and whether the price limits and reimbursement rules set for the relevant period were complied with.

If an insurer finds that a provider is charging for services unjustifiably or outside the scope of the contract, it typically demands repayment of amounts already reimbursed or refuses reimbursement. If the dispute escalates into administrative proceedings or judicial review, it is appropriate to handle it within the framework of commercial and court disputes. 

In the event of a serious or repeated breach of contractual or statutory obligations, the insurer may also impose a contractual penalty under the terms agreed in the contract with the insurer or sanctions under Act No. 48/1997 Coll. It is not uncommon for the amounts to reach hundreds of thousands to millions of Czech crowns.

In these situations, the provider often defends itself in administrative proceedings on its own—and without legal knowledge of the Public Health Insurance Act and case law, it very often loses. In practice, it pays to have contractual documentation and the ordering process clearly set up in advance, for which the analysis Commercial contract vs. order: When an order is sufficient and when a company risks a problem may also be useful. 

Example from practice: A clinic signed a contract with a health insurance company to provide orthopaedic care services. During an audit, the insurer found that certain procedures had been invoiced under an incorrect code. 

In substance, they were similar types of care, but under the reimbursement rules they should have been billed differently. The insurer demanded repayment of a total of CZK 800,000, and the case ended in a disputed exchange of letters. 

The attorneys at ARROWS, a Prague-based law firm, identified an error in the interpretation of the reimbursement rules, and by correcting the contractual argumentation during renewed negotiations they managed to restore the relationship with the insurer and successfully defend the amount.

Sanctions for breaches of qualification requirements

If a healthcare provider employs physicians or medical staff who do not meet the qualification requirements for the relevant care, this is a serious breach of the Czech Act on Health Services. Sanctions may include a financial penalty of up to CZK 500,000, and in serious cases or repeated breaches up to CZK 1,000,000 (under Act No. 372/2011 Coll., on Health Services).

Additional sanctions may include withdrawal of the authorisation to provide a specific health service or revocation of accreditation (in the case of educational programmes). In extreme cases, this may result in the complete revocation of the licence to operate the healthcare service. 

Qualification requirements are far from uniform—they vary depending on the type of care, whether the provider is a private or public healthcare facility, and they are frequently updated.

Without legal support, situations can easily arise where management believes everything is in order, but the supervisory authority finds, for example, that a core physician does not hold the correct specialised authorisation for the given field.

GDPR and personal data protection

A healthcare provider processes so-called special categories of personal data (health data). This means that the very collection and storage of such data must be carried out in strict compliance with the GDPR and Act No. 110/2019 Coll.

Common mistakes include storing patient data in an unsecured system or on an unencrypted USB drive without the necessary authentication. Another mistake is when the healthcare provider does not inform patients transparently about how and why their data is processed, or when employees have access to more patients’ data than is strictly necessary to perform their job duties. 

Providers also often do not have a signed data processing agreement with their subcontractors (e.g., an IT infrastructure lessor or a cloud services provider).

A GDPR sanction does not necessarily have to come from the Czech Office for Personal Data Protection (ÚOOÚ)—but if a patient or their legal representative files a complaint, the ÚOOÚ will address the matter, and the breach may result in a fine of up to EUR 20 million or 4% of the undertaking’s total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher.

Tax obligations and administration

Healthcare providers are often in a complex position within the VAT and income tax system. Some services are VAT-exempt, others are not. Providers who combine services reimbursed by health insurers (exempt) with services paid directly by patients (taxable) must keep proper internal accounting and distinguish what is exempt and what is not.

Errors in VAT and income tax typically surface during a tax authority audit and usually lead to penalties, interest, and additional tax assessments. It is not uncommon for an audit to uncover errors in the range of CZK 500,000 to CZK 1,000,000 for the years during which the provider operated.

Procedural errors in contracts

Contracts between the provider and the health insurer, between the provider and patients, or between the healthcare provider and subcontractors are often the subject of disputes. Without legal review, these contracts may contain unclear payment terms, invalid liability clauses (which may lead to invalidity of the entire contract), missing or incorrect wording on patient data protection, and incorrect determination of notice periods or dispute resolution mechanisms.

When a dispute arises, a poorly drafted contract means the provider is unable to defend its position.

Table of key legal risks and how to address them

How do ARROWS attorneys help healthcare providers?

Healthcare providers are typically run by physicians or managers with medical training—which is precisely why navigating the Public Health Insurance Act, GDPR, administrative procedures, or tax legislation is not their primary skill. Yet these areas represent the greatest financial and legal risks.

The attorneys at ARROWS, a Prague-based law firm, specialise in healthcare law and assist providers in two ways.

Preventive legal support

This means that ARROWS first conducts an audit of the current situation—how contracts are set up, how the provider handles data, what the tax obligations are, and what the relationships with health insurance companies look like. Based on the audit, ARROWS then prepares a review and update of contracts with health insurance companies and patients.

It also prepares work manuals and internal policies for staff (e.g., how patient data is handled), training for management and the HR department, and a data security audit and the preparation of processes compliant with GDPR. Last but not least, this includes tax advisory services aimed at optimising VAT and corporate income tax.

These measures are not one-off—the healthcare environment evolves. Health insurance companies change reimbursement rules, legislators amend legislation, and supervisory authorities interpret standards differently. 

The attorneys at ARROWS therefore also offer long-term external legal advisory services, where the facility has access to advice and legal expertise whenever it needs it.

Defence against sanctions and practical dispute resolution

If a healthcare provider is already facing an inspection, a fine, or a dispute, the attorneys at ARROWS provide representation during inspections. An ARROWS attorney participates in the inspection, helps the provider with responses, protects its interests, and records any shortcomings in the inspection process.

The attorneys also prepare the defence. ARROWS prepares written defence submissions, legal opinions, and arguments against fines or findings of supervisory authorities. Another service is negotiations with authorities and insurers—ARROWS attorneys negotiate with the insurer or supervisory authorities, seeking reductions of fines, extensions of deadlines, or compromise solutions.

If the matter ends up in court, ARROWS, a Prague-based law firm, provides full legal representation.

Final summary

Healthcare providers operate in one of the most complex legal environments in the Czech Republic. It is not only about medicine—it is also about insurance law, taxes, personal data protection, qualification requirements, administrative proceedings, and strict oversight by several regulatory authorities.

Without legal support, healthcare providers can easily end up in a situation where they report care incorrectly and the insurer demands millions from them, or where staff are not properly qualified and they risk high sanctions. There is also the risk of GDPR breaches with significant fines, tax errors requiring additional tax payments with interest, and poorly drafted contracts that make it impossible to defend your position.

The attorneys at ARROWS, a Prague-based law firm, have a deep understanding of these issues. They know the practices of individual health insurance companies, are familiar with how regulators interpret legislation, have experience with litigation in this sector, and help healthcare providers not only prevent problems but also defend against them.

If you run a healthcare facility and want to reduce legal risks, avoid fines, ensure the security of patient data, and be prepared for an inspection, contact ARROWS, a Prague-based law firm, at consultation@arws.cz. Our Prague-based attorneys will prepare a personalised legal strategy tailored to your needs.

Read also:

• Medicinal Product Distribution Licensing and Compliance in Czechia:
• Medicinal Product Storage in Czechia: Authorisations, Inspections and Compliance:
• Cybersecurity and AI Act: Compliance for hospitals and public institutions:
• Phishing Under the New Cybersecurity Act: Managers’ Personal Liability:
• Legal Duties and Personal Liability of Managerial Employees in Czechia: